代写范文

留学资讯

写作技巧

论文代写专题

服务承诺

资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达

51Due提供Essay,Paper,Report,Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导,同时涵盖Personal Statement,转学申请等留学文书代写。

51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标

私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企,高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展

积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈

Touchpad

2013-11-13 来源: 类别: 更多范文

TouchPad Economic/ October 3, 2011 Hewlett Packard’s foray into tablet computers is a good example of the laws of demand and supply, surplus and shortages. HP entered the tablet market with the HP TouchPad in August 2011. Market Equilibrium was never achieved with the HP TouchPad. Apple and their iPad currently dominate the tablet computer market. Sales of TouchPad were so poor, HP dropped prices on the tablets by more than 80%. Law of Demand and Supply The price of the TouchPad was fairly expensive when first released. Potential customers were already enamored with Apple’s iPad, which cause a determinant of demand on the TouchPad. The “determinants of demand are sometimes referred to as demand shifters.” (page number McConnel, Brue and Flynn). Unfortunately HP couldn’t convince consumers their product was as good as the competitions. Now HP had a surplus of tablets in inventory that weren’t moving. In the computer industry inventory must move and everyday of stagnation millions of dollars can be lost. Once they began lowering their prices the law of demand kicked in and the TouchPad began to sell. At the same time the law of supply was decreasing the quantities supplied as prices continued to decrease. Eventually HP lowered the prices to a ridiculous $99.00 for a 16GB model, and $149.00 for the 32GB model. Demand went through the roof with many vendors selling out in hours. Demand was higher than inventory and there were TouchPad shortages worldwide. Market Equilibrium HP is set to produce more TouchPads this fall but haven’t said they will keep their fire sale prices in place. Of course demand is still there but if the prices go up the demand will go down. The TouchPad never reached an equilibrium price. Initial pricing of the TouchPad was higher than buyers were willing to pay. Even when HP slashed prices by 40% buyers were still not buying. Only when HP lowered their prices to unbelievable levels did customers get on board. But HP lost money at those super low prices. The intentions of buyers and sellers never matched. The equilibrium price was never achieved and without it we cannot have equilibrium quantity. It will be interesting to see what happens on HP’s next TouchPad sale. References McConnell, R., Brue, S., & Flynn, S. (2009). Economics: Principles, Problems, and Policies, Eighteenth Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin. Retrieved from https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/content/eBookLibrary2/content/eReader.aspx
上一篇:Unforgetable_Experience 下一篇:To_His_Coy_Mistress_by_Andrew_