服务承诺
资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达
51Due提供Essay,Paper,Report,Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导,同时涵盖Personal Statement,转学申请等留学文书代写。
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企,高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展
积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈The_Case
2013-11-13 来源: 类别: 更多范文
Gilberto Carreras
Business Law LS311
Professor: Brent Halbleib
Unit 2
There are several torts that can be brought to court depending on the situation at hand. There are also several ways that the plaintiff can be compensated for the actions that are being brought about by the complaint. Ms. Yvonne Esposito regarding duty of care brought on a negligence tort against Jason Davis. Ms. Esposito was knocked down while trying to exit the premise of the arts and craft show that she had attended
Negligence is defined as an unintentional tort and occurs when someone is injured because of the failure of someone else. Duty of care is the obligation by an individual to keep foreseeable harm from others. Certain actions can be tolerated and some cannot; which simply means that some actions are right and some actions are wrong. (Fundamentals of Business Law, pg. 80) In this case John Davis was at the exit while patrons left the art show. Unexpectedly Mr. Davis spun around colliding with Ms. Esposito. Ms. Esposito, an 80-year-old woman, fell to the ground because of the collision with John Davis. The fall to the ground fractured Ms. Esposito’s hip and resulted in replacement hip surgery for her. The law recognizes the duty on the part of the employer to keep the flow of the pedestrians unobstructed. The burden imposed upon John Davis to keep a proper lookout in the access area to a building is easy to show. Whereas, showing the likelihood of serious injury when a patron is knocked to the ground is much harder to prove. The burden of such a precaution is reasonable in order to protect customers or pedestrians in their use of the access areas to a building." AN employee is an extension of the employer and is under the same obligations.
While John Davis’s intentions were simply to move from one point to the next and unintentional they were careless. His actions were also preventable. He could have used better judgment and common sense to move from the exit in a safer manner. Davis’ lack of judgment resulted in Ms. Esposito’s injury and was definitely preventable.
Reference:
Miller, R.L. & Jentz, G.A. (2010). Fundamentals and Business Law: Summarized Cases. 8th Edition. Cengage Learning

