服务承诺
资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达
51Due提供Essay,Paper,Report,Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导,同时涵盖Personal Statement,转学申请等留学文书代写。
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企,高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展
积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈Satirical_Wilson
2013-11-13 来源: 类别: 更多范文
The environment, and the way to which conserve, it has been an endless predicament over the past few decades between the environmentalists and their critics. Environmentalists, feeling susceptible the menace of global warming, and their critics, who feel there is no need to fret, have become extremely immature in their problem solving manners. However, the pattern is identical with the critics, which have also been feeling unease, not by the cutting down of forests, but by the loss of their money and the radical environmentalists. In contemporary scientist Edward O. Wilson’s book The Future of Life, he satirizes both the critics and the environmentalists as unproductive by showing how immature, stereotypical, and hypocritical both groups are towards each other.
In Wilson’s first article “The people-first critic stereotypes the environmentalists”, he is writing as if he is a radical and ludicrous critic of the “enemy”, the environmentalists. His satire illustrates just how destructive the critics are when he writes, “Depending on how angry we are, we call them greens, enviros, environmental extremists, or environmental wackos.” Wilson is clearly presenting how immature the critics are by name calling, a habit of only idiots and third graders. He believes to stereotype somebody is wrong and that an effective adult would not dare to do so. “Mark my word, conservation pushed by these people always goes too far, because it is an instrument for gaining political power.” Here, Wilson is stating that the critics believe that the environmentalists only want to gain political power, when in fact the environmentalists just

