服务承诺
资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达
51Due提供Essay,Paper,Report,Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导,同时涵盖Personal Statement,转学申请等留学文书代写。
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企,高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展
积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈Quality_in_Early_Years
2013-11-13 来源: 类别: 更多范文
Key Issues and Contemporary debates in early childhood
Thursday 28th October 2010
Introduction
Driving forward the quality of education is high on the priorities of both British and
Scottish Governments (SG) and this is equally true of early years’ provision.
Effective, high quality early years provisions are high on the political agenda and as a
result quality assurance is a key feature of all provisions. There is a continual debate
however, surrounding the definition of quality and the procedures which need to be in
place to best achieve it.
Quality
The quality of provision in early years’ settings has increased over the years, so too
has the awareness and debate surrounding what constitutes quality. Her Majesty’s
Inspectorate of Education (HMIe) (2009) points out the quality of education within
early years remains to be effective which is then mirrored in the experiences of
primary one. SG asked the Organisation of Economic Co-operation Department to
investigate the quality of education frameworks within Scotland. Their report
highlights the significance of early years within the education system; this innovation
arose from the standards in Scotland’s Act 2000 giving local authorities the
responsibility to provide pre-school provision for all three and four year olds
(OECD, 2007). Early years’ environments are dynamic and vitally important and this
requires effective quality at all levels. Among administrators and politicians there is a
shared belief that efficient and high quality early childhood care and education is
essential. To ensure Scotland’s early years’ settings are delivering a quality, effective
service that meets the needs of all children and their families, HMIe and Care
Commission (CC) carry out rigorous inspections identifying key strengths,
indicating where improvement is needed and proposing recommendations for
improvement. HMIe work in parallel with CC and alongside effective self evaluation
ensure that the focus is on improvement. HMIe (online) states inspections are a
fundamental principle to assure learners, parents and the public about the quality of
care and education provided by pre-school settings. I believe, in order to maintain
and enhance quality in early years, it is vital for all learning environments to be
inspected regularly and robustly. This will be discussed further on. Early years are
the most crucial development years with regard to childhood development. Therefore
care and education in today’s society must provide quality in order to enhance
learning opportunities for young children. The discussion will move to focus
on the factors surrounding quality. What is quality' How do we measure quality'
How do we ensure quality'
Quality in early years
Quality matters a lot. Throughout the world there have been numerous developments
within government manifestoes, agendas and curriculum programmes which
challenges our understanding of what constitutes ‘high quality’ within an early years
setting. Early intervention is high on SG agenda in order to improve the quality of
lives for all Scottish children. SG are committed to ensuring all children have the best
start in life and believe children should have as many opportunities as possible
steering them in the right direction which in turn will decrease the need for
intervention later in life (Scottish Government, 2008). As part of SG commitment to
ensure quality and equity the Getting it right for every child (GIRFEC) agenda was
introduced in 2008. GIRFEC aim is to improve outcomes and the overall wellbeing
of all children and young people within Scotland. GIRFEC is policy driven, aligned
with the public service reform agenda and reflects the the principals of early years and
early intervention and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the child
(UNCRC), to ensure all children are given the best scope to enhance their life
opportunities. In order to achieve these principles all children should be Safe,
Healthy, Active, Nurtured, Achieving, Respected, Responsible and Included
(Scottish Government, 2008). Few would disagree that it is vital to consider the child
as a whole and the environment which supports their development when considering
quality in an early years setting. This strengthens the argument that quality is
relevant, and is based on principles. The importance of quality depends on
practitioner’s beliefs and values about children’s developments and also their
knowledge of delivering learning programmes. Cable and Miller (2008) discuss the
factors behind quality and the driving forces, emphasising the importance for
practitioners to have a clear understanding of quality frameworks. Practitioners
should understand and demonstrate quality practice with relevant theoretical
knowledge in order to deliver effective care and education. This draws me to look at
the level of professionalism within early years and the question, are quality early
years settings effective because of highly skilled practitioners'
Early year’s workforce
Professionalism in early years within Scotland has been high on the policy agenda for
some time. At policy level professionalism is generally concerned with the level of
training and qualifications required to work within early years. SG (2007) recognises
the intricate roles early years practitioners carry out daily and the significance of
raising the standards within the workforce in order for children to receive quality care
and education, which will lead to more positive outcomes later in life. A quality
early years’ experience requires practitioners who are highly trained and skilled at
delivering effective learning programmes for all children, and able to work with
a range of diverse families. However there is not a universal agreement that ‘skilled
practitioners’ are essential for early years’ provision, as Hevey and Curtis (1999, cited
in Miller and Cable, 2008) points out the role of an early years’ worker is
misunderstood by public attitudes and is seen as a substitute mothering role. SG does
recognise how important the earliest years are and the need for early intervention,
placing quality at the core of early years services (Scottish Government, 2008). There
is an extensive amount of evidence highlighting how quality early years’ settings can
enhance children’s developments. The Effective Provision of Pre-school Education
(EPPE) (2004) reports nurseries where practitioners hold high qualifications are key
to the delivery of an effective quality service and their children will progress further.
HMIe (2009) reported early years’ settings in Scotland where leadership was ‘weak’
also found gaps in the quality of learning experiences provided to children. Therefore
in response to the National Review of the Early Years’ and Childcare Workforce the
SG aim is to strengthen leadership, ensure all settings are led by leaders who are
qualified at SCQF level 9 and to create learning opportunities for others working
within early years (Scottish Executive, 2006). The connection between leadership
and quality provision is also vital for early years’ settings. O’Sullivan (2009)
describes leadership as someone who understands the process of a child’s
developments and will consider the main principles of how to deliver effective
learning and teaching in order for children to develop. Effective leadership is an
essential factor in delivering quality provision in early years. In review of the above
question there is ample evidence to support the premise a well qualified workforce
does add to the quality of service delivered within an early years’ setting. At this
point it is essential to consider how quality is maintained within an early years’ setting
as it is also connected to local and national government frameworks and inspections.
Focus will now move to the purpose of inspection and how these inform settings
about the quality of learning being delivered.
Quality assurance – HMIe and CC
The UNCRC illustrates the importance of safeguarding children’s rights, ensuring
their health and wellbeing needs are met and to broaden their opportunities, which in
turn will allow them to reach their full potential (Unicef, online). SG aims to
demonstrate the principles of UNCRC throughout their policies and legislations and
ensure all children are protected and receive quality care and education were
necessary (Scottish government, online). Scottish nurseries are inspected by HMIe
and CC which in turn contributes to the SG aim to improve public services. SG are
continuously looking at ways to improve the quality of early years’ settings and
recognise the significance of providing a curriculum of quality effective learning
programmes to meet the needs of all children. Practitioners working within
early years will embed the principles from the National Care Standards (NCS) and
Child at the Centre 2 (CATC2) to ensure all children receive a quality experience.
Both of these documents provide a framework to ensure quality provision and give
staff a benchmark from which they can measure their success. The documents
are connected and are used throughout the inspection process by HMIe and CC.
HMIe (2008) states one of the key aims of inspection is to encourage practitioners to
generate improvements in children’s education. In order for practitioners to further
develop the quality of children’s learning experiences it is vital they participate in a
process of self evaluation which assesses and improves their service with a focus on
contexts of early education to improve the lives of Scotland’s children (HMIe, 2007).
Therefore early years’ settings must ensure they carry out regular and rigorous self
evaluation which will enable them to assess their strengths and weakness and plan
targets to enhance the quality of service they are providing. It is imperative for
practitioners within the setting, to participate in their own system of reflective self
evaluation as this informs practitioners of their own strengths and weaknesses and
enables them to highlight their own learning developments and concentrate on areas
of practice which require improvement. Williams (2002) suggests reflective practice
enables our everyday intuition to engage with a ‘professional approach’, connecting
the professional knowledge along with emotional qualities. Thus practitioners who
reflect on their practice are competent in creating a quality productive learning
environment which is fundamental to effective early years’ provision. Implementing
effective processes of self evaluation will inform the setting about the quality of
learning and achievements and how the overall service is being provided.
Conclusion
Quality should be an on going process in which discussion, debate and development
take centre roles. In the demanding complex world of early years ‘ticking the
box’ no longer ‘fits the bill’ when ensuring quality provision within this profession.
Quality early years’ work relies on the development of effective and respectful
partnerships. This is a profession were the quality of the results can be directly
connected to the quality of the practitioners working within this field. The way
forward for early years in Scotland is to continue to place quality learning within
quality provision at the core of its policies and practices. All practitioners working
within early years should work towards continuous professional development (CPD),
gaining accreditations and qualifications where appropriate, which in turn would lead
to high quality early childhood education. Quality learning is the key to improved
outcomes for all children. It is vital intervention is made at the earliest stage in order
for children to receive the best start in their learning. The importance of high quality
in the earliest years will also lead to better outcomes for children as they progress
through school and to later social advantages in adulthood.
Word count: 1807
References
Craft, A. and Paige-Smith, A. (2008) ‘Reflective Practice’ in L. Miller and C. Cable (eds) Professionalism In The Early Years. London: Hodder Education, pp. 87 – 97.
HMIe. (2009) A report by HMIe on inspection and review 2005 – 2008 at http://www.hmie.gov.uk/documents/publications/ise09.pdf (last accessed 20.10.10
HMIe. (2008) Improving outcomes for learners through self-evaluation at http://www.hmie.gov.uk/documents/publications/ioltse.pdf (last accessed 23/10/10)
HMIe. (online) Inspectorate of Education at http:// www.hmie.gov.uk/aboutus/inspectionresources/ (last accessed 12.10.10)
Miller, L. and Cable, C. (2008) Professionalism In The Early Years. London: Hodder Education.
OECD. (2007) OECD Review of the Quality and Equity of Education Outcomes in Scotland Diagnostic Report at http:// www.oecd.org/dataoecd/2/50/39744132.pdf (last accessed 23.10.10)
O’Sullivan, J. (2009) Leadership In The Early Years: Making a Difference. London: Ashford Colour Press Ltd.
Owen, S. and Haynes, G. (2008) ‘Developing Professionalism in The Early Years: From Policy To Practice in L. Miller and C. Cable (eds) Professionalism In The Early Years. London: Hodder Education, pp. 9 – 20.
Scottish Government. (2008) A Guide to Getting it right for every child at http://www.scotland.gov.uk/publications/2008/09/22091734/1 (last accessed 24.10.10)
Scottish Government. (online) Children’s Rights at http:// www.scotland.gov.uk/topics/people/young-people/childrens-rights (last accessed 20.10.10)
Scottish Government. (2008) Early Years and Early Intervention A joint Scottish Government and Cosla policy statement. Edinburgh: RR Donnelley.
Scottish Executive. (2008) National Review of the Early Years and Childcare Workforce Scottish Response at http:// www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/142793/0036099.pdf (last accessed 15.10.10)
Scottish Government. (2008) The Early Years Framework at http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resources/Doc/257007/0076309.pdf (last accessed
15.10.10)
Scottish Government. (2007) The Standards for Childhood Practice at http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/benchmark/scottish/earlyYears.pdf (last accessed 15.10.10)
HMIe. (2007) The Child at the Centre Self Evaluation in The Early Years. Edinburgh: RR. Donnelley.
The Effective Provision of Pre-School. (2004) Findings from Pre-school to the end of key stage 1 at http://www.education.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/ssu_SF_2004_01.pdf (last accessed 17/10/10)
Unicef. (online) Convention on the rights of the child at http://www.unicef.org/crc/index_30160.html (last accessed 13.10.10)

