服务承诺
资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达
51Due提供Essay,Paper,Report,Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导,同时涵盖Personal Statement,转学申请等留学文书代写。
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企,高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展
积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈Pttls_Theory_Assignment_4__Ground_Rules
2013-11-13 来源: 类别: 更多范文
PTTLS Theory Assignments Q4: Explain the ways in which you could establish ground rules with your learners which underpin behaviour and respect for others.
Ground rules are be defined as “the basic rules or principles on which future actions or behaviour should be based” (Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English). In a learning environment this can be developed by the statement “ground rules set the minimum necessary conditions for learning work to be done”.
Without ground rules there is no transparency about the behaviours a group expects of itself and ‘bad’ behaviours, whatever theses might be, are difficult to manage as boundaries will not have been previously set (“nobody told me that I wasn’t supposed to….”).
Because of their importance to group dynamics and learning outcomes, ground rules should be agrees as soon as is practically possible.
There are a number of ways that a group could approach setting ground rules:
1) The tutor reveals a set of rules that they have pre-determined as the best, and imposes these without discussion.
2) The learners take full responsibility for all the rules that they agree with each other and the tutor accepts these with no additions.
3) A combination of these two approaches is employed. Learners create their rules, with clarification from the tutor, as well as being given some ‘must do’ items, as set out by the tutor.
All these would create a set of ground rules, but the question is which of the options creates the most effective rules for future behaviours and learning'
Option 1 is a very directive approach and, as the tutor has decided all the rules in advance and allows no leeway for alteration. The ownership of the rules lies solely with the tutor and it is likely that at least some of them will not be a good fit to the group. Their buy-in could be severely limited, particularly if there are strong feelings about what is included or omitted.
Option 2 leaves all the responsibility for the ground rules to the group. This sounds very ‘fair’ (the group’s rules will be entirely owned by them) but could miss some issues. As they are not experienced in delivering learning, they might omit important points that should be included.
Option 3 can combine the best of the other two approaches and avoid the disadvantages. By offering the group an opportunity to create their own rules they engage with these and understand them fully. Helpful clarification facilitated by the tutor can assist this process. The addition of any ‘missing’ rules by the tutor (e.g. all assignments must be in on time or will not be marked) provide an effective foundation for future work.

