Multidimensional_World

This essay is targeted for 3D living humans Right now you take for granted that you are living in the moment, and what have happened in the past, never can be undone. You think you live in the present. This is perfectly true for us 3D living creatures! But scientists and mathematicians have found out that our world (call it dimension) is only one of more dimensions, and that means that we are probably living in at least eleven dimensions at the same time… On top of this; the higher dimension, the verier conception of the cosmos. Is this possible or just nonsense' Something that scientists investigate because of lack of other ideas' Hold on, we are going to get deeper into these questions in this essay. Imagine the 2D world as a shadow on a table. The shape of the shadow comes from a light source shining upon a 3D object in the air, the 2D shadow then only reflects 2 of this 3-dimension object on the table (Rob Bryanton). Presume that there is a ball upon the table, which the shadow passes, and the shadow will get affected of course, because the shadow is bent around the ball. In the 2D world this appears as the shadow grows without reason. Now try to visualize something very illogical at this point: assume that the shadow had eyes; it would see the ball like a line from the side (it is impossible to see a shadow on a table if your view is horizontal with the table). As the shadow from the 3D object passes the real 3D object, a ball etc., the shadow now has a bigger area in the 3D. A 2D object understands the world as 1D, as we (3D objects) understand the world in 2D. I am going to explain this clearer in the next paragraph. It is a lot easier to imagine the 3D world because it is the one we live in. But we have to pay special attention to one statement: we are humans and interpret the world by our sins. By our eyes we see the world. Actually we do not see the world in 3D as we think; we perceive it in 2D (Ronald E. Smith 1)(Michael W. Passer 2). This can be compared to the shadow (assume that a shadow has eyes…). Shadows would, if they could, see the world in only one dimension. It is impossible for the shadow to see itself from above, because it is plain. In the exact same way is it working for us; as we look around we see everything in 2D (our brains put it together to make fake 3D picture) (Psychology, Frontiers and applications ). If we actually saw the world in pure 3D, we should be able to see our entire lives until now. We should be able to see back in the time because that is what actually is possible at the 4th dimension. The shadow does not recognize any height-difference while passing a 3D ball on the table; and we do not recognize any time-difference while travel fast or passing curves of the time. The time should go in a different speed e.g. near a black hole; but a human should still interpret it as her “own” time, which always has the same pace. There is a big problem understanding higher dimensions and it is a real masterpiece what Albert Einstein did - discovering the dimension above ours. Consider for example that the shadow (in the 2D world) should found out that it was a result of a 3D world - in the 2D world a real 3D object can move from one point to each other real quick and invisible because it is not properly “regarded” in the 2D world. Imagine an ant on a newspaper and that they are objects in the 2D world. If the newspaper was bent in 3D, the ant could easily climb unto the other side of the newspaper. In 2D though, this would look like the ant was transferred to the other side. The 4D world shows itself in the exact same way in our 3D world – it shows itself improperly because we cannot regard it correctly with just 3 dimensions! But not everyone agrees on these hypotheses of how the cosmos is formed. For example; many Christians do not believe in anything more powerful than God. This is a quote by an American organisation which means that quantum physics are fake theories: “Abstract: Is the science of Quantum Mechanics the greatest threat to Christianity' Some years ago the journal Christianity Today suggested precisely that. It is true that QM is a daunting subject. This barrier is largely responsible for the fear. But when the veil is torn away, the study of QM builds a remarkably robust Christian apologetic. When pragmatic & logically invalid interpretations are removed, there remain four possibilities for the nature of reality (based on the work of philosopher Henry Stapp). Additional analysis shows two are exclusive to theism. The third can be formulated with or without God. The last is consistent only with atheism. By considering additional criteria, options that deny God can be shown to be false.” (James Daniel Sinclair). Organisations in the US are gathering members against science. They pretend to come up with evidences for God in “scientific” ways. Many organisations also specify themselves in brainwashing youths; in order to help them to: “stand strong in their faith amid the challenges of an increasingly secular culture with our Good Science, Good Faith curriculum”. (Reasons to believe). I think it is moral-less to try consciously to affect teenager’s world view. If they are convinced that their ideas are the truth, then they should not oblige young people to believe in it. Contrary; those who speak for quantum physics do not have any pushing programs for conveying kids to believe in their theories! Of course it is hard to prove any of these theories, pro-quantum physics and anti-quantum physics (pro-God). I believe the anti-quantum physics believers lack evidence for many statements. For example; they prove scientific proposals wrong, but never prove any of their own ideas. The pro-quantum physics do prove their own statements and ideas with solid mathematics and physics laws etc. but on the other hand, they have never proved the absence of a God… As a conclusion of this is: no-one has the answer and no-one can prove the other wrong. Personally; I can believe in both sides just because of this fact. When the absence of God cannot be proved it would be stupid to repudiate the idea howsoever. When there are mathematical calculations/proofs for other dimensions, it would be stupid to not deem in that. What is left to do' To continue researching in scientific ways in this fascinating topic and keeping in mind that it is probably impossible to find out any entire truth of the universe. Bibliography Andersson, Björn. Ljungberg, Anne-Marie .Olsson, Johan. Wikström, Joacim. Svarta hål. 0 Mar. 2004. Fysik Chalmers. 20 Sep. 2009. . Bryanton, Rob. Imagining the tenth dimension. 12 Jan. 2007. Imagining the tenth dimension. 23 Sep. 2009. . David, Michael. The quantum physics of time." Scientific American. -1 Mar. 1994: . Deutch, Lockwood. "The quantum physics of time." Scientific American. -1 Mar. 1994: .¨ E. Smith, Ronald. Psychology Frontiers and applications. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009. Rodaway, Paul. Sensuous Geographies: Body, Sense, and Place. USA: Taylor and Francis e-library, 2002. Sinclair, James Daniel. THE METAPHYSICS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS. -1 2000. Reasons to believe. 24 Sep. 2009. . Tesseroid, Basic Concepts of the Fourth Spatial Dimension. Notes On The 4th Spatial Dimension. 12 Jan. 2007. Imagining the tenth dimension. 23 Sep. 2009. . W. Passer, Michael. Psychology Frontiers and applications. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009.