服务承诺
资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达
51Due提供Essay,Paper,Report,Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导,同时涵盖Personal Statement,转学申请等留学文书代写。
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企,高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展
积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈John_Marshall_and_American_Nationalism
2013-11-13 来源: 类别: 更多范文
AP U.S. History
Which of the following made the most important contribution to American nationalism after the War of 1812: John Marshall, Daniel Webster, Henry Clay, or John Quincy Adams' Justify your selection.
John Marshall, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States government for thirty-five years, made important contributions to American nationalism after the War of 1812. An avid believer of judicial nationalism, Marshall believed in a strong central government of laws. The constitution is the supreme law, and this is the guiding force of the workings of nationalism. Just like the epochal case of Marbury v. Madison, Marshall was part of many landmark cases of American government and nationalism such as McCulloch v. Maryland, Cohens v. Virginia, and Gibbons v. Ogden.
In the year 1819, McCulloch v. Maryland upheld the right of Congress to create a Bank of the United States, ruling that it was a power implied, but not specified by the Constitution. The case is significant because it advanced the doctrine of implied powers, or a loose construction of the Constitution. The Court, Chief Justice John Marshall wrote, would pass laws reflecting “the letter and spirit” of the American Constitution.
In the court case Cohens v. Virginia in 1821, Philip and Mendes Cohen sold lottery tickets in Virginia under the authority of an act of Congress for the District of Columbia. The Cohens appealed their conviction for violating the state statute, which had banned such lotteries. Virginia asserted that the Eleventh Amendment excluded Supreme Court from hearing the case and that Section 25 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 did not apply. The Cohens case reflected the effort by several states, including Virginia, to challenge John Marshall's opinion in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). Marshall seized on Cohens to stress federal judicial power. He declared that the Constitution made the Union supreme and that the federal judiciary was the ultimate constitutional judge. Marshall avoided Virginia’s non-cooperation by holding that the lottery statute applied only in the District of Columbia, but Virginia states' rights advocates nonetheless blasted his judicial nationalism.
Another of Marshall’s cases in 1824, the court case Gibbons v. Ogden defined Congress's right to regulate commerce. Aaron Ogden had filed a suit in New York against Thomas Gibbons for operating a rival steamboat service between New York and New Jersey ports. Ogden had the right to operate steamboats in New York under a state law, while Gibbons held only a federal license. Gibbons lost the case and appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reversed the decision. The Court declared that the New York law was unconstitutional, since the power to regulate interstate commerce, which extended to the regulation of navigation, belonged exclusively to Congress. In the 20th century, Chief Justice John Marshall's broad definition of commerce was used to uphold civil rights, a topic pertaining to American nationalism.

