服务承诺
资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达
51Due提供Essay,Paper,Report,Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导,同时涵盖Personal Statement,转学申请等留学文书代写。
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企,高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展
积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈European_Scramble_for_Africa
2013-11-13 来源: 类别: 更多范文
Dylan Powers
AP World History
Rice
3 February 2012
DBQ Africa
The European Scramble for Africa was a period of time, late 19th early 20th centuries, where European powers tried to take countries in Africa either for resources or power. Many African leaders were given an ultimatum by the Europeans; either give us your land, or we will kill you. Some problems started because the Europeans tried to create land contracts which would give ownership of the land to the whites, but giving protection from external forces for the natives (1). The African leaders did not respond well to this, and tried to rally the African people to fight back to the Europeans. Many African leaders sent letter or gave speeches stating they did not want protection from these European countries, and that they were being raided, murdered, and overtaken by the Europeans (2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 9). In one speech, Yaa Asantewa even called upon the women to help fight in war, a task in which women were not previously inclined to do. They were asked to fight until death, because if they did not fight, they were destined to be slaves, prisoners of war, or even killed. This shows that the Africans were desperate for warriors (6, 7). When the Europeans started advancing, the Africans had a choice: fight back and face almost certain death, or retreat into a life of misery, slavery, and other hardships (7). Many chose to fight, but to no prevail. Even though the retaliations by the African tribes were fierce, they were no match for the Europeans’ automatic weapons. These weapons gave the Europeans an unfair advantage and eventually led to the fall of the natives (4, 5). The points of view of these accounts were skewed a little. These documents of brutality were told through the eyes of the losing faction, the Africans, which is not how war is generally documented. The Europeans may have been brutal, but maybe not as bad as described by the Africans (4, 7, 9). One additional document that could help better understand this issue would be one of a Europeans reasoning behind the conquering of land in Africa. This would better explain why they wanted the land so bad, and why the Africans were rationalizing the way they did.

