服务承诺
资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达
51Due提供Essay,Paper,Report,Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导,同时涵盖Personal Statement,转学申请等留学文书代写。
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企,高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展
积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈Discussion_Paper
2013-11-13 来源: 类别: 更多范文
DISCUSSION PAPER
SUBJECT: Recommended multinational command structure with command relationships for coalition forces to defend Azerbaijan
1. ISSUE. Develop and justify multinational command structure with command relationships
for coalition to defend Azerbaijan.
2. The Lead Nation Multinational Command structure is depicted in this paper.
3. Advantages.
a. A lead nation multinational command structure allows an integrated staff (to a degree) to ensure cooperation among multinational or national subordinate elements. It also centralizes command structure that provides flexibility and the ability to work and succeed in all situations.
b. The lead nation multinational command structure tends to allow better interaction and involvement between members. This translates to and allows the lead nation command to successfully command and control multinational forces (i.e. provide support, coordinate with national allies and their headquarters, coordinate and administer forces to other assignments or operational requirements).
4. Disadvantages.
a. During the initial stages of developing a coalition or specific command structure, coalition partners may not be willing to give up control to one nation or a lead nation and may tend to go with an integrated command structure.
b. Agreement between all nations involved may be a contention in developing who will be the lead nation, what the lead nation will provide, and how much control.
5. Justification:
The situation in Azerbaijan requires a lead nation multinational command structure that has the will and capability, competence and influence to provide essential military leadership to coordinate the planning and execution of a coalition military operation. In the type of operations to be conducted in the small area of Azerbaijan against the South Azeri People’s Army (SAPA), the structure and capability of a Lead Nation to provide quick and decisive decision making as well as overarching command and control (C2) functions of military operations is paramount to mission success. The integrated staff in a lead nation structure will also allow the commander to draw upon the knowledge and expertise of coalition partners to assist in operational planning and making planning.

