Describe_How_Your_Nursing_Practice_Paralleled_the_Code_of_Ethics

Who Am I Presentation Peer Evaluation |Your name :MATHEWKUTTY STEPHEN | |Name of student you are evaluating: SHERLY THOMAS | |Criteria |Possible |Points |Comments | | |Points |Earned | | |Content: |50 |49 |The content of the presentation was | |Was the content of the presentation consistent, appropriate, high levels | | |consistent, appropriate, with integrity and | |of integrity, detail rich & specific' | | |sufficient details. | |Organization: |10 |9 |It was well organized with clean and clear | |Was the organization clean with clear ideas and arranged logically, | | |ideas and arranged very logically with smooth| |transitions smooth, consistent flow in logic' | | |transition and consistent flow. | |Design: |15 |15 |Very well formatted with strong visual | |Was the presentation formatted well, with strong visual impact, design, &| | |impact, appropriate pictures and design. | |format' | | | | |Style and Readability: |10 |9 |The style was excellent. Readability could | |Was the readability strong with attention paid to audience, appropriate | | |have improved if the comments were written | |use of tone & style, good transitional language' | | |concisely in a bigger print, closer to the | | | | |corresponding pictures. | |Grammar: |15 |13 |Consistent Standard American English is used | |Did the speaker use appropriate grammar, punctuation, mechanics & usage, | | |throughout the presentation. | |consistent with Standard American English' | | | | |Total Points Earned |95 | Additional Comments: Who Am I Presentation Peer Evaluation |Your name : MATHEWKUTTY STEPHEN | |Name of student you are evaluating :MINIMOL GEEVARGHESE | |Criteria |Possible |Points |Comments | | |Points |Earned | | |Content: |50 |50 |The presentation had the appropriate content,| |Was the content of the presentation consistent, appropriate, high levels | | |integrated well and sufficient details. | |of integrity, detail rich & specific' | | | | |Organization: |10 |9 |The organization was done well with clear | |Was the organization clean with clear ideas and arranged logically, | | |logical ideas and had smooth transition and | |transitions smooth, consistent flow in logic' | | |consistent flow. | |Design: |15 |14 |It had an excellent visual impact related to | |Was the presentation formatted well, with strong visual impact, design, &| | |great design and format. | |format' | | | | |Style and Readability: |10 |10 |The audience can easily correlate the | |Was the readability strong with attention paid to audience, appropriate | | |pictures and the text as the style and | |use of tone & style, good transitional language' | | |language used are excellent. | |Grammar: |15 |14 |Appropriate Standard American English is used| |Did the speaker use appropriate grammar, punctuation, mechanics & usage, | | |throughout the presentation. | |consistent with Standard American English' | | | | |Total Points Earned |97 | Additional Comments: Who Am I Presentation Peer Evaluation |Your name :MATHEWKUTTTY STEPHEN | |Name of student you are evaluating: CILVI CHACKO | |Criteria |Possible |Points |Comments | | |Points |Earned | | |Content: |50 |49 |It was enriched with details, appropriate, | |Was the content of the presentation consistent, appropriate, high levels | | |and with good integrity. | |of integrity, detail rich & specific' | | | | |Organization: |10 |10 |Wisely organized presentation with great | |Was the organization clean with clear ideas and arranged logically, | | |ideas and logic and had a smooth transition | |transitions smooth, consistent flow in logic' | | |and flow. | |Design: |15 |14 |Attractive design and formatting noted and | |Was the presentation formatted well, with strong visual impact, design, &| | |family pictures were very appealing. | |format' | | | | |Style and Readability: |10 |10 |There was perfect readability and the | |Was the readability strong with attention paid to audience, appropriate | | |captions were appropriate. | |use of tone & style, good transitional language' | | | | |Grammar: |15 |14 |The presentation used Standard American | |Did the speaker use appropriate grammar, punctuation, mechanics & usage, | | |English guidelines. | |consistent with Standard American English' | | | | |Total Points Earned |97 | Additional Comments: Who Am I Presentation Peer Evaluation |Your name :MATHEWKUTTY STEPHEN | |Name of student you are evaluating: JISSY SEBASTIAN | |Criteria |Possible |Points |Comments | | |Points |Earned | | |Content: |50 |49 |A wonderful presentation with a consistent | |Was the content of the presentation consistent, appropriate, high levels | | |and detailed approach. | |of integrity, detail rich & specific' | | | | |Organization: |10 |9 |Clean and clear ideas presented in a well | |Was the organization clean with clear ideas and arranged logically, | | |organized and consistent manner. | |transitions smooth, consistent flow in logic' | | | | |Design: |15 |14 |Design and format were perfectly matching the| |Was the presentation formatted well, with strong visual impact, design, &| | |content. | |format' | | | | |Style and Readability: |10 |10 |Readability was excellent with appropriate | |Was the readability strong with attention paid to audience, appropriate | | |color and background design. | |use of tone & style, good transitional language' | | | | |Grammar: |15 |14 |There was perfect English language use | |Did the speaker use appropriate grammar, punctuation, mechanics & usage, | | |throught. | |consistent with Standard American English' | | | | |Total Points Earned |96 | Additional Comments: Who Am I Presentation Peer Evaluation |Your name: MATHEWKUTTY STEPHEN | |Name of student you are evaluating :KOCHURANI JOSEPH | |Criteria |Possible |Points |Comments | | |Points |Earned | | |Content: |50 |50 |The overall presentation was excellent with | |Was the content of the presentation consistent, appropriate, high levels | | |pertinent information and related pictures. | |of integrity, detail rich & specific' | | | | |Organization: |10 |09 |Obvious organizational skills and logic flow | |Was the organization clean with clear ideas and arranged logically, | | |and transitions noted. | |transitions smooth, consistent flow in logic' | | | | |Design: |15 |14 |The slide was formatted well with adequate | |Was the presentation formatted well, with strong visual impact, design, &| | |spacing. | |format' | | | | |Style and Readability: |10 |10 |The images, graphics and text contributed a | |Was the readability strong with attention paid to audience, appropriate | | |lot towards readability and style. | |use of tone & style, good transitional language' | | | | |Grammar: |15 |14 |The presentation was loyal to Standard | |Did the speaker use appropriate grammar, punctuation, mechanics & usage, | | |American English guidelines. | |consistent with Standard American English' | | | | |Total Points Earned |97 | Additional Comments: