Decion_Making

[pic] (1)The simple decision making process: Buy plasma 3D HD.: I want plasma 3D HD.: (1) I have to identifying the problem: I want to buy a new plasma T.V. because my T.V. start giving poor image or poor picture quality and has old technology, I need the 3D HD plasma, and I have to solve it' (2) Identification of the decision criteria: My criteria for buying plasma 3D HD is: 1-picture (image quality) 2-features (most powerful details) 3-value (price) 4-size (inch) (3) Allocation of weight criteria: |Criteria |weight | | | | |1-pictuer (image quality) |10 | |2-feactures (most powerful |9 | |details) | | |3-value (price) |7 | |4-size (inch) |4 | (4) Development of alternatives: |Alternatives |Picture |features |Value |Size |result | |1-SAMSUNG PN50c800 plasma 3D |9.5 |9.6 |9.2 |9.4 |28.3 | |2-LG 551E5500 plasma 3D |8.6 |9.4 |8.9 |9.1 |26.9 | |3-PANASONIC TC-P5425 plasma 3D |9.1 |8.5 |9.4 |9 |27 | |4-SONY KDL-52EX700 plasma 3D |9.2 |6.7 |8.8 |9 |24.7 | |5-VIZIO VF552XVT plasma 3D |8.2 |9.2 |8.9 |8.6 |26.3 | (5) Analysis of alternative: 1 – Samsung is the highest picture quality Sony Panasonic LG Vizio 2-Samsung has the most powerful features LG Vizio Panasonic Sony 3- Panasonic have highest value Samsung LG and Vizio have same value Sony has lowest value. (6) Selection of an alternative: I have chosen Samsung. (7) Decision implementation (going and take the Samsung PNSOC800 plasma 3D HD to my home and being to use it) (8) After using this plasma I found its successful choice. Every criteria I have analyses was perfect picture-features-value-size my problem in picture quality was solve.