Darwin_vs_Creationism

Darwin reads the Bible Darwinism has been butting heads with creationism for decades. Darwinism is a theory on the way the world would began through mass evolution, whereas creationism argues that some form of God or deity created the universe as though just waving a magical wand. The main difference between the two arguments is where each gathers their evidence. Darwinism is based on logical theories and hard science while creationism bases its logic on faith and beliefs of the unknown. Creationism is an invalid argument that should not stand in the way of evolutionism. Darwinism follows scientific principles through logical theories. Charles Darwin (left) creditor of Darwinism; explains how a gross amount of time and a process called natural selection is responsible for modern day evolution. In the beginning of the world two atoms would collide creating the universe as it is today through millions of years of experimentation and species growth, coupled with the concept of natural selection a selection that chooses a random species and instills a new trait into that particular species genetics. For example, an animal growing wings would pass that trait to the next offspring while the others in the pack that did not grow wings would eventually die (allaboutscience). The strong survive because they can adopt. Another example of natural selection is monkeys, which are the most similar mammal to humans, evolving into the human species. The concept is natural selection but the process is survival of the fittest; the strongest have progressed through millennia and have brought us to today where humans are the rulers of the world and control virtually every aspect of life. This will continue until Mother Nature randomly selects a new species to rival humans and best human kind and thus the circle of life continues. Right shows Charles Darwin depicted as a monkey reflected by ideas about monkeys and evolution. Creationism is based on practices in theology. Theology is the study of God and branches into ties of creationism (Shol). Creationists believe that a God created the almighty universe within a moment. There is not really any further explanation as to when or where this God came from other than existing in a reality outside our own reality. Left depicts man and God. But people who follow creationism are firm in their own believe of a supernatural creator that created the alpha and can cause the omega. In contrast to natural selection creationists do not believe in a randomly created world where humans consequently ended up as the superior race; instead they have faith in an unseen orchestrated path for all of humankind. God has created every detail from the smallest cell to the grand Milky Way; he has illustrated all life and has a purpose for everything in his sandbox (God and science) One basis for believers of creationism might be from neglect of any purpose in life driving oneself to seek a reason for living and in return settling for a God and a form of higher reason through that God’s gift of life. In this sense Creationism differs from Charles Darwin’s theory of Darwinism adding the element of purpose in our life’s instead of pure random coincidence. Why is the debate so monumental and what should we believe' Questions focused on the origin of the first atoms or origins of God blur the lines in the debate. The whole debate could even crumble to nothing from these fundamental philosophical questions. The real reason why the debate is so constantly fought over is because it essentially touches everyone on the planet. People stand on either sides of the fence living their lives for a God, a divine higher purpose or living their lives completely free of an overseeing conscious. People live on a hope that their actions affect the overall scheme of life. However to keep consistency throughout the world the more logical “creation story” should be implemented. Disregarding the origin of God and atoms how can faith in a supernatural power beyond our reality stand in argument against random creation through natural selection in our physical world' The reality behind this situation is that Darwinism deals with physical truth and science while creationism positions itself outside this truth into a senseless guess. Believing in an unknown only prolongs evolution. If people believe that there is some form of higher power than they are only living a life in the shadows. Truth should be known so generations that follow us do not waste their time preaching and debating over a theory that can never be proven. People want something to believe in. That is why religion is not going anywhere. Creationism cannot be taken seriously and implementation in the world is just throwing fire on this endless debate. By removing this theory people can start to live with their eyes open to life instead of consciously tied to a whim of a higher power. Darwinism shows us how natural selection has crafted the world we live in today, it shows us how life with a mass amount of time can create extraordinary beings created through continuous evolution and explains how life is randomly planned through the principle of survival of the fittest. Contrasting Darwinism is Creationism the perspective of a God creating the universe, governing all living things at any given moment and existing in a realm of life beyond our physical reality (God and science). Our life is not monitored by an unseen eye but instead by a steadfast of random, constantly changing factors of natural selection. Life is not about any higher purpose; life is driven by our own reasons to live. Life is meant to be truthful and allowing creationism into anyway of life is restricting not only to our generation but to our species overall. Creationism is invalid and should be removed from Darwinism’s path.