代写范文

留学资讯

写作技巧

论文代写专题

服务承诺

资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达

51Due提供Essay,Paper,Report,Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导,同时涵盖Personal Statement,转学申请等留学文书代写。

51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标

私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企,高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展

积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈

Cis_115_Treatment_Programs

2013-11-13 来源: 类别: 更多范文

5 Running head: JUVENILE DELINQUENT TREATMENT PROGRAMS Juvenile Delinquent Treatment Programs Mountain State University Abstract What treatment program works best for rehabilitating youth delinquents' The aim of this paper will be to review various treatments, their impact, and make recommendations for rehabilitation treatments and areas for future research. Juvenile Delinquent Treatment Programs Juvenile crime can alter the life of the victim and the offender forever. Many People disagree on how to handle crimes committed by youth offenders. Should they be treated as an adult or a child' What should be the consequences of the crime' How can we prevent the youth of American from committing crime' These are all great questions and there are many correct answers. Crime is not easily defined. For every crime there are a set of circumstances and events that lead up to the crime being carried out. How many youths commit crime' According to the U.S. Department of Justice (2008), “In 2008, there were 6,318 arrests for every 100,000 youths ages 10 through 17 in the United States” (para. 3). Elements for Successful Programs According to the Office of Independent Ombudsman for the Texas Youth Commission (2008), there are five common elements of successful anti-gang initiatives which include, “leadership, quality of information, prompt and appropriate management of behaviors, highly structured, and commitment to maximize staff resources” (Office of Independent Ombudsman for the Texas Youth Commission, 2008). I believe these five elements are beneficial not only for anti-gang initiatives but juvenile delinquent treatment programs. There are many different treatment programs aiming to prevent juvenile delinquency. Many states programs attempt early intervention and funding for community initiatives has allowed some independent groups to solve problems in new ways. According to Einstein Law (2008), the most effective programs are education, recreation, community involvement, prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses, parent-child interaction training program, bullying prevention, prevention programs within the juvenile justice system, Nebraska correctional youth facility, ending repeat offences and functional family therapy. “Most effective youthful offender programs include in-depth evaluation, screening and assessment; daily scheduling; point system discipline; positive behavioral support therapy; and education, including literacy, GED preparation and computer literacy” (Hess, 2004, p. 359). According to the University of Pittsburgh (n.d.), “Multisystemic Therapy has shown promise as a cost-effective strategy for decreasing the number of incarcerated offenders while reducing their antisocial behavior, and it is the only treatment to demonstrate short-term and long-term efficacy with chronic, serious, and violent juvenile offenders” (p. 3). Multisystemic Therapy interventions are child focused, family centered, and directed toward solving multiple problems across the numerous contexts in which youths are embedded and interventions are tailored towards specific needs (n.d.). In theory, many people think that if someone commits a crime one time that is the best time to try a rehabilitation program in order to reduce further crime in life. However, research shows that 70% of youths who are arrested once, are never arrested again (Hess, p. 399). Therefore, based on the facts, the money available for prevention programs should target repeat offenders not first time offenders. Ineffective Programs Juvenile treatment programs that have had the least success and proven to be ineffective are scare tactics, juvenile boot camp, and scared straight programs (Einstein Law, 2008). While these treatment programs goal was to ensure juveniles knew that crime would not be tolerated and organized to install fear there was no correlation with decreasing crime. In fact, according to Hess (2004) youth that had been placed in the adult system actually had a higher recidivism rate than similar juveniles placed in juvenile detention facilities. Juveniles placed in adult jails also had a higher rate of being abused by other inmates and guards (2004). Another program shown to be ineffective is the DARE program which stands for Drug Abuse Resistance Education. According to Hanson (2007), “DARE is not only ineffective, but also sometimes counterproductive. That is, students who graduate from DARE are sometimes more likely than others to drink or do drugs” (para. 3). Future Research Our nation needs to put efforts towards the 8% problem. According to the U.S. Department of Justice (2001). "8 percent of the juveniles were arrested repeatedly (a minimum of 4 times within a 3 year period) and were responsible for 55% of repeat cases" (p. 1). If we can find out what program rehabilitates the youths who commit over 55% of all crimes we can change the crime rate of the nation. "Even a modest reduction in recidivism rates for the 8% problem group could result in major, long-term savings" (2001, p. 2). References Hanson, D. J. (2007). Effectiveness of DARE. Retrieved from http://www2.potsdam.edu/hansondj/youthissues/1059145293.html Einstein Law. (2008). Juvenile delinquency prevention. Retrieved from http://www.lawyershop.com/practice-areas/criminal-law/juvenile-law/prevention/ Hess, K.M. (2004). Juvenile Justice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Office of Independent Ombudsman for the Texas Youth Commission. (2008). Gang Prevention and Intervention Best Practices and Recommendations for the Texas Youth Commission. Retrieved from http://www.tyc.state.tx.us/ombudsman/rpt_GangPrevention.pdf Stone, S. (n.d.). Changing nature of juvenile offenders. Retrieved from http://ojjdp.ncjrs.gov/conference/track1.html not yet U.S. Department of Justice. (2008). Juvenile arrest trend rates. Retrieved from http://www.ojjdp.ncjrs.gov/ojstatbb/crime/JAR_Display.asp'ID=qa05200 U.S. Department of Justice (2001). OJJDP fact sheet. Retrieved February 1, 2010 from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/fs200139.pdf University of Pittsburgh. (n.d.). Effectiveness of treatment for violent juvenile delinquents. Retrieved from http://www.education.pitt.edu/ocd/publications/sr1993-03.pdf[pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic]
上一篇:Cloud_Street 下一篇:Checkpoint_Individual_Theories