Analysis_of_Team_Charter

Each individual personalities and behavior are exercise through personal characteristics that perceive through their attitudes, motives, interests, past experiences, and expectations. In context to set course the personality’s differences, types and levels will manifest accordingly when building a group work collaboration reflecting the individual strengths and weaknesses. To evaluate this matter each group member performed a series assessment that measures their skills, interests, and abilities. The self scoring assessment generates a scale of individual listening skills, do trusts others and personality type. The interpretation of these results will demonstrate their abilities and type for each individual how should we conduct and share within the group for any project assignment. (John R. Schermerhorn, James G. Hunt, Richard N. Osborn 2003) “Groups are important settings where people learn from one another and share job skills and knowledge”. Analysis We have four team members where three have personalities of being realistic, logical, analytical, and decisive as well a natural head for business or mechanics. The other participant is a visionary, outgoing, argumentative, have a low tolerance for incompetence, and often seen as a natural leader. By having all these participants with different types of personalities analytical, decisive, argumentative and, realistic will provide the necessary strengths to perform the appropriate decision making. “A commitment to teamwork is found in the willingness of every member to “listen and respond constructively to views expressed by others, give others the benefit of the doubt, provide support, and recognize the interests and achievements of others” (John R. Schermerhorn, James G. Hunt, Richard N. Osborn 2003) thus, among naturally people dimensionally will conduct their activities having different patterns and experiences will determine their capacity to carry out their responsibilities. Another assessment taken by the team members were to determine the effective communication for good listening skills, each member scored within a scale range between 50 to 56 that falls arbitrary to be a normal listener. “Listening, the process of taking in what we hear and mentally organizing it to make sense of it is an invaluable component of the communication process. ”(Suzanne C. De Janasz, Karen O. Dowd, Beth Z. Schneider 2002) the communication process to culminate any aspect involves the other party attention, however the message or idea must be transmitted clearly to not overlook and confuse what is presented, the more ambiguous or complex the listener will not understand or interpret erroneously the purpose. As for the team members will distinctively have to share and ensure that we listen clearly in order to interact together and avoid any bias. The last assessment that our team members answered was Do I Trust Others where they scored from a scale between 2 to 4, this assessment determines the faith levels that people have with other individuals based on influences that are perceive by attitudes, motives, experiences, and expectations. “Trust is a multifaceted concept which captures one’s faith or belief in the integrity or reliability of another person or thing.” (Suzanne C. De Janasz, Karen O. Dowd, Beth Z. Schneider 2002). As team players’ must developed and establish a bond that maturely create a trustworthy relationship that will fortify the accomplishments of any project. Conclusion To ensure the success of any assignment the team members must reflect, perceive and understand their strengths and weaknesses substantially will identify by using matrix analysis, essential skills, assessments, and effective communication to culminate the team success. The importance of all this no matter what we do we must be sincere with ourselves.