服务承诺
资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达
51Due提供Essay,Paper,Report,Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导,同时涵盖Personal Statement,转学申请等留学文书代写。
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企,高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展
积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈Amazon-Macmillan_Battle
2013-11-13 来源: 类别: 更多范文
Amazon has revolutionized the e-book reader market with the introduction of their Kindle device. They’ve made it easy and fun to buy e-books from anywhere and enjoy them instantly. One roadblock that they’re running into is agreements with publishers, however. They’ve devised a pricing scheme that’s financially great for both publishers and consumers. Amazon charges $9.99 for the e-book, and they pay half of the hardcover retail price to the publisher, often times losing money themselves. Publishers fear that this pricing will create a negative public perception of the price of books by lowering the value of books in the minds of consumers. Macmillan has pulled all of its books from the Amazon book store until it reaches an agreement with Amazon about pricing. Since then, they’ve run a full page ad in the New York Times, saying “Available at bookstores everywhere except Amazon,” further adding to the negative press that Amazon has received due to this.
This dispute between Amazon and Macmillan show how important it is to build strong business partnerships. Amazon made this innovative pricing scheme and they implemented it even though they had little support from the publishers for it. Because of that, they’re currently unable to sell dozens of books and they’ve gotten a lot of negative publicity. It’s important to consult partners and reach an agreement before doing something that could affect them so that both businesses stay on the same page and relations between them stay good. This particular dispute was over the mental perception of how much a book is worth. It may have been a good idea for Amazon to consult Macmillan’s marketing department to gather their feedback. Macmillan’s marketing department would have a lot of information about what the perceived value of the books they sell are, and they would’ve been able to give good feedback about the change.

