Stem_Cells

Stem Cells What is morally correct when it comes to fetal tissue and human embryo research' In article “Nod to Fetal Tissue Research May Ignite Ethical Firestorm” by Tim Friend printed in the USA TODAY this question is addressed purposed. Researchers want to use “pre-embryo’s” to have as a source of stem cells. Is This any better, as a posed to the use of regular embryos' “The word pre-embryo is a false term” according to Judie Brown, president of the American Life League in Stafford, Va. She claims “An embryo is and embryo at fertilization, period!” Though, other people in this article do an excellent job at stating the opposing view. It says that a pre-embryo consists of a tiny ball of cells, that lack a nervous system and don’t contain any limps or organs. It would be depending on religious beliefs as to if this should be regarded as human life or not. Judy Brown added to this comment that “What they’re purposing is to take tiny babies, redefine them as scientific material and destroy them for the purpose of research and experimentation.” And it is because of concerns like those of Judy Brown’s that the Roslin Institute research, article, embryo, tissue, president, pre-embryo, own, judy, fetal, embryos, brown, written, way, wanted, view, tiny, stem, really, read, people, opposing, morally, methods, made, life, human, form, find, dolly, cloning, cells, cell, behind, this