A_Racial_Analysis_Of_Capital_Punishment

A Racial Analysis Of Capital Punishment A Racial Analysis of Capital Punishment In simple terms, “capital punishment is the lawful taking of a person’s life after conviction for a crime” (Flander, 3). In an historical aspect, capital punishment traces as far back as the earliest times of Western Civilization. The first criminal laws were the practice of personal justice. Stephen Flanders writes in his book Capital Punishment: “the infliction of death for purpose of retribution has been a facet of human existence since earliest times. Even before the emergence of organized societies, individuals killed to avenge wrongs done to them and their families. There was no code that specified wrongful conduct or penalties such behavior would incur” (4). The earliest recorded sets of laws were known to Western society as the Babylonian Hammurabi code. It decreed the death penalty for crimes as minor as the fraudulent sale of beer. Egyptians were also killed for disclosing sacred burial places and for the theft of valuable heirlooms (Flander, 5). “Historically, one of the reasons societies had relied so heavily on the death penalty was that other punishment options did not exist” (Flander, 6). As more organized social structures developed, crimes were divided into public and private offenses. Public punishment, capital, death, penalty, people, tivnan, crimes, money, believe, should, person, life, innocent, society, one, issue, effectiveness, debate, crime, winters, taxpayer’s, sacred, moral, men, justice, flander, fewer, fairness, executed, effective, criminals, criminal, costanzo, civilization, been