Visicection

Visicection Sophisticated non-animal testing methods exist, so why not spare animals lives. According to Dallas Pratt, M.D., “Many systems using either animal or human cell or organ cultures, as well as plant materials and microorganisms, have been created with emphasis on those which are rapid, inexpensive, and can discriminate between those chemicals whose properties represent a high toxicity risk and those which are relatively innocuous.” Highly complex and mathematical and computer models can be used to further define the specific problems a product may cause in human use. Animal rights imply that animals deserve certain consideration- consideration of what is in their own best interests regardless of whether they are cute, useful to humans, or an endangered species and regardless of whether any human cares about them at all. Just as a mentally-challenged human has rights even if he or she is not cute or useful or even if everyone dislikes him or her. It means recognizing that animals are not ours to use for food, clothing, entertainment or experimentation Animal welfare theories accept that animals have interests but allow these interests to be traded away as long as there are some human benefits that are thought animals, human, animal, tests, medical, experiments, between, using, testing, less, interests, consideration, whether, vivisection, useful, tissues, studies, smoking, research, product, law, just, even, discovery, cute, computer, cancer, because, act, work, welfare, vitro, vaccines, unnecessarily, take