Tornado

Tornado Similarity in several respects between discrete cases. A logical argument by analogy relies upon an inductive inference from the supposition that things are similar is certain known respects to the likelihood that they are also similar in some further unknown respect. Example: "Jennifer enjoys listening to the music of Beethoven, Mahler, and Bartok. Susan and Harold also like Beethoven, Mahler, and Bartok. Chris enjoys listening to Beethoven and Mahler. Therefore, Chris would probably like the music of Bartok, too." The degree of reliability achieved by such an argument depends upon the extent and nature of the similarities that hold between the instances in its premises and the new case in its conclusion. Also see DPM, Keith J. Holyoak and Paul Thagard, Allison Barnes and Paul Thagard, and Amélie Frost Benedikt. Analogical Reasoning The simplest variety of inductive reasoning is argument by analogy, which takes note of the fact that two or more things are similar in some respects and concludes that they are probably also similar in some further respect. Not every analogy is an argument; we frequently use such comparisons simply to explain or illustrate what we mean. But arguments by analogy are common, too. Suppose, for example, that conclusion, true, argument, premises, inductive, inference, false, valid, likely, deductive, arguments, analogy, truth, three, reasoning, new, instances, possible, general, friends, delighted, between, standard, similar, respect, out, one, make, invalid, buy, bought, analogical, while, variety, upon, therefore