Smokers_And_Non_Smokers_Rights

Smokers And Non Smokers Rights Smokers and Non-smokers’ Rights In Stanley S. Scott’s short essay “Smokers Get A Raw Deal,” Scott’s version of a non-smoker is unjust. Scott sees smokers as being segregated because of prejudice. Scott does not realize the hazards of smoking and the effects of second hand smoke. Stanley S. Scott’s essay does not portray the side of the smoker and the nonsmoker fairly. The essay does not recognize the harm of smoking and the rights a non-smoker has to a breathe friendly environment. Scott uses discrimination in the wrong text. Scott states in his essay that “discrimination is discrimination, no matter what it is based on.” I do not agree with that statement. I think discrimination is discrimination to a certain extent. Lets think realistically here. Would you want to walk into the movie theatre, sit down and try to enjoy the movie with a theatre filled with smoke' Scott also asks that “Could ice cream, cake, and cookies become socially unacceptable because their consumption causes obesity'” Eating ice cream, cake, and cookies may cause obesity, but it does not effect the health of others nearby like second hand smoke does. The incidents that Scott uses to prove that smokers are victims smokers, smoke, think, scott, smoking, essay, second, hand, scott’s, discrimination, common, should, people, non-smokers, very, statement, smoker, risk, rights, non-smoker, don’t, courtesy, cigarette, because, about, way, violence, victims, theatre, store, states, stanley, society, since, sense