Bible_Translation_Analysis

Bible Translation Analysis It seems that every religion has a different idea of how to interpret the bible. Most people have a certain preference of bible simply because they grew up with a certain edition. I, having never read the bible in any edition prior to the seven versions I read for this analysis, have chosen the Everett Fox translation as my preference. On a literary note, the Everett Fox version seems to have the most power to its words. This version keeps an accurate, yet poetic feel to it, and still accomplishes the impression the bible should have. In the seven versions I sampled, I found there to be three that had distinctive characteristics. The Everett Fox seemed to be the most accurate, the JPS seemed to be the most comprehendible, and the Contemporary English Version seemed to be the simplest, yet it lacks accuracy. Everett Fox uses names that are true to the original Hebrew language such as “Yaakov” for Jacob, and Yitzhak for Isaac. His punctuation and syntax hold the poetic value that was intended in the original Hebrew: “God called the light: Day! And the darkness he called: Night! / There was setting, there was dawning: one day.” (FOX, GEN 1:5). version, poetic, fox, english, translation, bible, accuracy, words, hebrew, day, value, seven, jps, everett, easily, bit, yet, while, understood, edition, disadvantages, called, versions, translations, translating, toward, stories, seemed, samples, same, readers, reader, read, preference, own, night