Mills_Vs._Hospers

Mills Vs. Hospers Mill’s utilitarian moral theory and Hospers libertarian moral theory disagree with each other about what is morally correct to do under certain circumstances. In many ways Mill’s utilitarian moral theory would be considered the right way or the only way. In contrast, Hospers libertarian moral theory would also be the right way or the only way. If one could combine the two theories together, then I believe, an almost perfect moral theory would be established. The only problem is that Mill’s and Hospers theories tend to disagree with the basic structures of each other’s theories. It would be almost impossible to combine the two together. I just feel that both theories have their strong points to bring the “greater good” to society and individuals, unfortunately, because of their differences; it would be too impossible to combine them together. “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.”(Mill). When Mill speaks of happiness, he doesn’t just mean the happiness of the person acting, but instead everyone that is affected by the action. This requires us to maximize the total amount of happiness moral, hospers, theory, one, life, theories, right, restitution, mill’s, both, way, happiness, choices, choose, out, morally, greater, good, choice, took, should, permitted, others, living, lives, live, individual, exacting, each, different, combine, building, bomber, because, very