Freud_Theory_vs_Bandura_theory

Freud Theory vs Bandura theory Freud perceives aggression as been a universal human behavior. Suppressed by the superego we are relativetly unware of its presence. Social circumstance, cultural surrounding and the environment plays a major role on how it is recalled to our conscious. For example a person with a strong infuencial moralistic codes is less likely to act aggressive because he or she might be brought into a setting that does not tolerate violence. Brandura emphasize primary on the nature of behavior , driven by conscious goals and motives. Most people involved in criminal or aggressive situation have motives solid intention of harming others. sometimes some people go as putting together a master plan of what how they want to achieve their goals. I will not take side in this matter mainly because I believe both men produce about 50/50 correct answer to this theory. Freud is absolutely correct about aggression as been universal and unconscious. All living things are create with a defence mechanism. Animals are aggressive toward others in defence of their territory and lives. Human being are more civilize and time to time can rationalize with these urges. When an individual feels betrayed by society or another person he or she ignores people, others, aggressive, countries, behavior, aggression, war, universal, time, things, person, nothing, motives, lives, learn, intention, human, goals, freud, foreign, example, especially, defence, correct, conscious, believe, been, because, another, act, about, 11th, world, wonder, without, violence, brandura, very, urges, unware, united, unconscious, trying, toward, tolerate, together, there, think, theory, terrorist, territory