Abraham Lincolna And Abolition--论文代写范文精选

51due论文代写网精选代写范文：“Abraham Lincolna And Abolition”在1863年由美国总统亚伯拉罕林肯提出了解放宣言。然而，这并不能保证平等和接受这些黑人的权利。到现在美国少数民族仍希望平等、尊重和接受。亚伯拉罕林肯做了一切用他的能力去完成这一目标，作为一个强有力的领导者，他必须保持自己的信念，许多人称他为保守派和革命家，事实上他就是一个保守的人。

Abraham Lincolna And Abolition The Role of Abraham Lincoln in the Abolition of Slavery I am going to analyze the essay, “The role of Abraham Lincoln in the Abolition of Slavery.” This was written by James M. McPherson, and he tries to let the reader understand what Abraham Lincoln had to do with the abolition of slavery. McPherson wants the reader to understand that Abraham Lincoln was a crossbreed between a conservative and a revolutionary thinker. He wants the reader to know that the slaves would not have been freed if it were not for Lincoln, but that he was not the sole factor in the event. The emancipation proclamation shows Lincoln’s push for this to happen, and the fact that it worked gives him a placed in history forever. The author wants to make clear that even though Lincoln was a large part of freeing the slaves that it was not his intent as president or for the war. The author states that although this revolutionary achievement was made, it was not part of Lincoln’s war aims. This gives Lincoln some conservative credibility, which is a great tactic to use to persuade the audience that Lincoln is not a full breed revolutionist. Another point that McPherson makes to prove his argument that Lincoln is a conservative is when he points out that Lincoln stated, “I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong.” Then follows it up by saying that Lincoln’s conflict was that as president he could not act officially on his private judgment concerning the moral issue of slavery. McPherson relies upon quoting Lincoln for most of his argumentative evidence. There is no quantitative evidence, nor does there need to be. Also, there are very little generalizations. He uses specific statements and political beliefs of the time period to persuade the reader that Lincoln was a conservative revolutionary. For example, when explaining how Lincoln wanted Congress to endorse his plan for gradual emancipation he showed Lincoln’s seriousness by using a quote. “It is impossible to foresee all the incidents which may attend and all the ruin which may follow.” This shows he knows something has to be done, but does it conservatively by trying to influence congress’s beliefs rather than forcing it onto them. In any argument there will be some people who agree and some who disagree. The goal is to make the most people possible agree with what you are trying to prove. McPherson is trying to show Lincoln’s role in the abolition of slavery as being both revolutionary and conservative. In his essay I think he will persuade many people to believe his opinion. Although there is not much evidence other than specific quotes and political statements, he gives the reader only the truth. Also, this article is flawless in the respect that he does not contradict himself at all. His beliefs are genuine and it shows through his commitment to non hippocritism. The credit for abolishing slavery can, for obvious reasons, not be given to one single man or even a group of men for that matter. However, Abraham Lincoln did everything in his power to achieve this goal. He had to stay within his beliefs though as a person and a powerful leader. Many labeled him a conservative, and many others a revolutionist. In truth he was both. Originally he was a conservative who believed things would sort of evolve to take care of themselves. He began to lean towards the side of a revolutionary while still keeping his conservative edge. The abolishing of slavery was a top priority for him and for the civil war. Lincoln dealt with it the way a conservative revolutionist would, the emancipation proclamation. 

51Due网站原创范文除特殊说明外一切图文著作权归51Due所有；未经51Due官方授权谢绝任何用途转载或刊发于媒体。如发生侵犯著作权现象，51Due保留一切法律追诉权。

更多论文代写范文欢迎访问我们主页 www.51due.com 当然有论文代写需求可以和我们24小时在线客服 QQ:800020041 联系交流。