Ontological_And_Teleological_Arguments

Ontological And Teleological Arguments The Ontological Argument St. Anselm felt God exists so truly that we can’t even deceive that he doesn’t exist. He does not begin about the facts of the world but goes straight to the conclusion of his being. His reason is what we mean by God is that nothing greater can be conceived. Even the fool who says there is no God has an existence as an object of thought. But Anselm believed to exist as well in the mind is the greater then just being thought of, therefore, God must exist. It’s better to exist truly than just to be an idea in the mind, a concept, thought in someone’s mind. If the fool wants to say that God exists only in the figment of the mind he’s making God a being that can be greater than just thought. If nothing greater can be thought he must exist in reality as well as in the mind. God then really exists and the fool in denying this is guilty of failing to understand what he is talking about. This applies to the most excellent of all being and only to that. We have the working notion that the being that nothing ontological, teleological, being, argument, god, existence, therefore, mind, thought, exist, order, reality, perfect, just, exists, cosmological, concept, one, kant, idea, greater, world, supreme, subject, real, must, infinite, fact, end, whole, way, universe, things, st, predicate, possible