Direct_Command_Theory_Of_Ethics

Direct Command Theory Of Ethics In order for one to be truly omnipotent there of course must be no limits on ones power. Any constriants what so ever render omnipotence a meaningless term. To say that an omnipotent beings power is in accordance with or follows a guideline law or any similar requirment is to limit the power of that being . To say that an omnipotent being acts in accordance with a law, is to imply that said being could not act without said law or that there would be some penalty or harm if the being were to do so. If onmipotnece is to be true it is not to be guided, circumscribed filtered etc.; these are limits in one way or another on power. To call a being good is to make a judgement about its character. Character judgements are derived from actions. To say that a being is good is to say that it demonstrates good behavior, that it’s actions are good actions. Besides actions one may also judge intent when judging character. Ones actions must not only be good they must be done with the intent the purpose of being good. Good actions are derived from the willing of reasoned good, being, actions, god, thing, one, knowledge, intent, say, power, must, judged, judge, world, way, said, reasons, reason, omnipotent, law, judgement, definition, character, thought, since, relationship, reasoning, possible, perfect, order, ones, merely, limits, itself, identity