Kant_Vs_Mill

Kant Vs Mill The goal of a philosopher is to come up with a theory that will be able to be applied in the world and prove to be successful. Ethical philosophers such as Aristotle, Mill, and Kant think of ways to better the world through morality in people. They form ideas that will be helpful in dealing with ethical issues of the world that are controversial and can be approached in many different ways. Each philosopher has a different belief and a different theory that can be used when faced with an ethical issue. It is up to the individual to decide which ethical approach would best fit their situation and produce the best outcome. One such ethical issue is euthanasia. Euthanasia can be described as voluntary mercy killing which benefits the patient. It is often done in times of great suffering for the patient who does not seem likely to live. There are two forms of euthanasia, active and passive. Active euthanasia is to do something which will lead to someone’s death. Passive euthanasia involves an omission of an action or not doing something that causes a beneficial death. This kant, one, mill, euthanasia, universal, theory, people, good, ethical, mill’s, should, imperatives, kant’s, whether, way, decision, categorical, something, issue, because, must, law, according, world, utility, theories, seems, question, produced, morality, moral, live, decisions, death, actions