Add-Adhd

Add-Adhd Attention deficit disorder is the subject of two widely challenged debates in medicinal practice and theory. One, the argument for ADD being a clinical and mental “disorder”, is in favor of medical treatment, claiming the diagnosis is attributable to brain damage or neurological defects. The second gives an alternative idea behind ADD, stating that people showing traits of the disorder often exemplify characteristics such as creativity, inventiveness, and even giftedness. As a rising percentage of children are being diagnosed with the disorder, more and more research has been called for, in an attempt to find an actual cause. ADD is classified as multi-factorial, meaning that multiple reasons are generally attributed to its development and diagnosis. A diagnostic criterion includes hyperactivity, impulsivity, and inattention. The intent of this paper is to provide arguments and evidence on both sides of the issue, followed by standard and alternative methods for dealing with ADD. The history of attention deficit disorder goes back to World War 1, when a number of soldiers who experienced head injuries demonstrated hyperactivity as a side effect. It was then that ADD was classified as a disorder related to either brain damage or a defect of some kind. It has add, , disorder, attention, deficit, been, diagnosed, children, studies, show, kids, hyperactivity, child, being, alternative, ritalin, methods, evidence, different, damage, cause, today, tasks, symptoms, society, side, problem, prescribed, percentage, people, mental, long, interest, includes, include, inattention, impulsivity, getting, fatty, drugs, difficulty, diagnostic, creativity, brain, attributed, approach, adults, widely, two, treatment, thoughts