Leon_Kass_Essay_Analysis

Leon Kass Essay Analysis Active euthanasia is defined as “painlessly putting individuals to death for merciful reasons, as when a doctor administers a lethal dose of medication to the patient.” (Beauchamp, Encarta) Leon Kass, a physician himself, believes that euthanasia is morally wrong. At the same time, if a patient voluntarily submits himself or herself to death, also known as voluntary euthanasia, can the physician be held responsible for murder, whereas if he was making the decision for someone who cannot make the decision, also known as non-voluntary euthanasia. At the same time, can it be that euthanasia is not morally wrong but yet, could be the saving grace for some people' The first part of the article Kass mentions about voluntary euthanasia and the belief that the doctors, out of respect for the patient, would be forced to abide by the requests of the patients. But yet in the next paragraph of the discussions, he mentions about non-voluntary euthanasia, and the pure belief that the doctor cannot make a decision based on medical terms. Yet Kass deems non-voluntary euthanasia to be completely illegal. If a person is suffering from massive internal bleeding and is bound to die, or euthanasia, people, doctor, yet, save, attempt, person, patient, kass, about, time, shows, same, pain, non-voluntary, decision, death, cannot, bound, wrong, voluntary, voluntarily, think, should, respiratory, power, physician, must, morphine, morally, mind, mentions, makes, make, life