服务承诺
资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达
51Due提供Essay,Paper,Report,Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导,同时涵盖Personal Statement,转学申请等留学文书代写。
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企,高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展
积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈Brown_V_Board
2013-11-13 来源: 类别: 更多范文
Brown V Board
Brown V. Board of Education of Topeka, 347, U.S. 483 (1954).
separate but equal are inherently unconstitutional. They are a violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Brown V. Board of Education of Topeka, 349, U.S. 294 (1955)
The supreme court establishes judicial guidelines for local courts in the desegregation of public schools.
Facts: A series of cases went to the Supreme Court from the states of Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, and Delaware. Since all of the cases involved the same basic problem-black minors, through their legal representatives, seeking the aid of the courts in obtaining admission to the public schools of their respective communities on a non-segregated basis-all were determined by one decision of the Court. The Kansas case is taken as the nominal leading case. In the various states, the black children were of elementary or high school age or both. Segregation requirements were on a statutory and state constitutional basis except in Kansas where only statutory provisions were involved.
Issue: Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities'
Decision: Yes unanimous vote
school, case, education, desegregation, schools, equal, brown, children, public, decision, segregation, students, african, one, court, board, american, white, plessy, amendment, supreme, rock, opportunity, little, troops, separate, justice, high, facilities, black, warren, time, though, system, state, south

