Illinois_Trial

Illinois Trial Family Law In this particular case I think that the Judges decision was fair because of the previous decision in the Stanley v Illinois trial. The decision stated that a parent has the right to stay home and raise their children, and it is no different in this case. The non-custodial parent has chosen to stay home with her children and shouldn’t have her right to stay home with her children taken away from her in this case. No court should overrule a parent’s decision to stay home with their children. The plaintiff would have to leave her children with someone else and go to work if it was decided for her to pay child support. It’s stated that the plaintiff is not unemployed, she works has a caregiver for her two young children and doesn’t get paid with money. She doesn’t work for money and therefore isn’t unemployed, but doesn’t have the money to pay child support. Although it may be unfair to release the plaintiff from her previous obligation with her first two children, it is also unfair to take away her right to stay home and raise her children. children, decision, stay, home, young, plaintiff, support, pay, child, case, two, right, reason, raise, money, judges, doesn’t, work, unfair, unemployment, unemployed, stated, shouldn’t, previous, physical, parent, mental, jeopardized, interfere, health, court, best, because, away, assets, agree