No_Labor=No_Unions

No Labor=No Unions No unions=No power for Labor After being a powerful force throughout the force in the 1950’s and 1960’s unions took a drastic turn for the worse in the three following decades. Throughout the 1970’s, 1980’s and the 1990’s organized labored struggled mightily to be effective and almost lost all of its power to big businesses. The employers fighting the unions was part of the problem for unions but this loss of power was due largely to the lack of support, and in some cases opposition, of the Federal Government towards labor unions. There are many reasons this loss of power by the unions took place. One of the most important reasons for this was because Union’s most powerful weapon, the strike, was all but taken away from them. As Mark A. de Bernardo, director of the Labor Law Action Center at the United States Chamber of Commerce said, “Labors trump card in a dispute, the strike, is no longer a trump”. (Boris p.598) strike came about because of the increase in scab labor. Scab labor is when new workers are hired to replace workers that are striking to get their demands reached. Led by the example given by administration of Ronald Reagan unions, labor, workers, companies, strike, union, power, government, employers, boris, out, new, federal, without, trump, states, scab, powerful, loss, just, example, even, disputes, conditions, united, union’s, took, throughout, texas, taken, take, tactics, striking, state, set, schlosser