A_Thin_Blue_Line

A Thin Blue Line A Thin Blue Line Documentary filmmakers I think are first responsible to themselves to produce a documentary that they are happy with. Second they are responsible to their audience t o produce an informative documentary. A Thin Blue Line was a good documentary I felt that it was very truthful, there was no voice over which, I, feel looses credibility and In a film like this it is very important to be credible because the audience has to decide for themselves that Randal Adams was innocent. The film A Thin Blue Line almost fits all five of Michael Weinberger requirements for it to be a documentary. Its does not satisfy the first requirement “It must attempt to tell a true story in a non dramatic fashion” this is why the film was made- to tell everyone what really happened that night and Morris did it in a dramatic way. It was everyone telling their side of the story, what I like was the way that they just came straight out to the viewers and tell the viewer that this man was wrongly convicted then backs it up with evidence. This leads to the second requirement “ it must attempt to do so think, documentary, film, adams, because, viewer, requirement, randall, original, must, movie, don’t, thin, order, line, context, blue, way, very, tell, story, side, said, out, made, know, innocent, happened, great, five, first, factual, boy, audience, attempt,