服务承诺
资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达
51Due提供Essay，Paper，Report，Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导，同时涵盖Personal Statement，转学申请等留学文书代写。
51Due将让你达成学业目标51Due将让你达成学业目标51Due将让你达成学业目标51Due将让你达成学业目标私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企，高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展
积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈On the issue of carbon dioxide emissions---Paper代写范文
2016-08-15 来源: 51Due教员组 类别: Paper范文
Paper代写范文:On the issue of carbon dioxide emissions这篇Paper探讨了美国对于二氧化碳排放采取的方式，增加碳税，使用清洁能源，鼓励企业开发新能源，经济结构转型，来减少二氧化碳的排放。减少二氧化碳对我们的下一代将是非常有益的，我们应该留下一些好的东西，而不是破坏世界上的一切美丽的东西。我们没有任何理由不注意我们自己的行为，以减少二氧化碳的排放。
In order to spare human beings the threats brought by climate change, the important international agreement---Kyoto Protocol, whose full name is Kyoto protocol of United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (short for UNFCCC), was passed in October of the year 1997 in Kyoto, Japan. It aims at the goal of ‘Limiting greenhouse gases concentrations in the atmosphere to a proper level and thus prevents drastic climate changes that would cause damages to human beings ’. The main greenhouse gas is carbon dioxide, so increasing countries has taken part into programs to avoid or at lease to reduce the carbon dioxide emissions. One of the popular and controversial measure is to enact a carbon cap (the maximum ceiling of carbon dioxide emission) and trade or a carbon tax, which is an economic leverage to adjust and affect people’s economic behaviors. This measure works because it adds the price of virtually everything probably by a small or large percentage since most of the things we buy or do now is related with energy to some extent. To consider this cost increase may change people’s way of doing things. Of course, there will be pros and cons when it comes to this topic, this paper will give a brief discussion in two sides around these issue reactions in the United States. After the brief analysis, the paper will present the personal point of view on this debatable topic.
Since the united States is a large country with its carbon dioxide emission taking up almost 25% of the global carbon dioxide emission, though all its population is only 3%-4% of the global total, actions that are taken by the American government will work as a wind indicator for other countries and have a far reaching influence on the rest of the world. Although having signed the Kyoto protocol in the year 1998, the Bush Administration refused to approve this Protocol in April of 2001 by saying that the policy to reduce greenhouse gases emission would have adverse effects on the US economy and that developing countries also have to bear similar obligations to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases (Tiberghien, Y., & Schreurs, M. A., 2007). But why is this case? Some people hold a negative opinion in this way: Limiting the carbon dioxide emission by an emission cap or carbon tax will require many people to change their current lifestyle in order to deal with the policy. And change of any kind will have a price to pay for. Under this added cost for various energies, products and services, people’s psychological expectation of living standard is lowered and hurt, the economically poor people in particular when they cannot afford any small increase in the cost of living. Apart from this, the current struggling and floundering economy in America in the aftermath of 2008 world financial crisis implies the moment is not the best time to implement such a policy of refraining purchasing of goods (because of energy limitation of carbon dioxide)when an aggressive policy of economy stimulus is in urgent need.
On the other hand, however, many people in the United America are on the other side of the balance, they are in strong favor of policy of carbon cap and trade and carbon tax. Because in their opinion, we human beings should and have to pay attention to the effects of human actions of using energy, whether it is good or bad. Contemplating carefully before taking actions is of prime significance. Needless to say, we should make the balance tipped to the good side, that is to say, human beings ought to reduce the price paid by them in the process to pursue a better and healthier economic development. People’s views on this sophisticated and controversial issue vary from person to person. Some said the price should be paid by the users of greenhouse gases, but how can people clearly make a distinction between the users and non-users of greenhouse gases? Besides, the final bad consequences will affect all human beings no matter if a specific person makes carbon dioxide emissions or not (Beschorner et al.,2000). Yes, this carbon tax or carbon cap policy works within the frame of free market economy, if a specific person or a company is doing well in reducing carbon emissions, there will be a certain incentive system, for example, money incentive or more tax rebate money in the operations of import and export, to be introduced and enforced. In fact, this is a very intriguing policy for many individuals and trade companies. On a further level, this economic method an effectively push businesses to move away from traditional energies and make use of increasingly more clear and alternative energies to reduce waste. The effect may not be obvious if only a few companies come to be engaged in this, but if more and more companies become involved in the new and alternative energies, the environment results will be amazing and encouraging. For example, if there is only one person thinking about protecting the environment all the time and doing a considerable number of actions to achieve it while others are just outsiders looking in without doing anything helpful and useful in order to reduce carbon dioxide, then the efficiency is very little. Only when every one of us in the world is fully aware of the seriousness and the importance of protecting the environment around can we benefit from it in a day. It is worth to mention that reducing carbon dioxide is a tough task which may need a long period of time to do. Besides, the development of clear energy itself is helpful to stimulate the economic growth. To view the larger economic landscape, this will be a great step forward for the whole economic structure transformation, since the clear energy usage percentage increases a lot in relation to the traditional fossil energy. Moreover, countering the seemingly forceful doubt that various production costs will add up when enforcing the carbon tax or emission cap, some people argue that the added costs may not be so much because the free market operators can always come up with some innovative solutions to reduce costs in one way or another, thus the actual benefits may probably surpass the added economic costs. That is absolutely true. Maybe at the first beginning, we are not able to see how much we are very likely to benefit from it, but as the time goes by, the good things will appear gradually.
In conclusion, taking all these factors into consideration, it is conspicuous that reducing carbon dioxide allows no delay, because human beings can not live without oxygen. Containing more CO2 in the air means containing less oxygen in the air for people to breathe. Meaning to say, if human beings do not take feasible and effective measures to protect our precious environment and reduce the emission of carbon dioxide, then we will have to pay for it in a day. And for that, human beings may not be able to endure. In addition, reducing carbon dioxide will be very helpful for our next generations; we should leave something good for them instead of ruining everything beautiful in the world. Reducing carbon dioxide is the first step that we have to take in order to refine our environment. Nature treats human beings with kindness and friendliness; therefore, we do not have any excuse not to pay attention to our own behavior to reduce the emission of carbon dioxide.
51Due原创版权郑重声明：原创范文源自编辑创作，未经官方许可，网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为，未经同意的情况下，51Due有权追究法律责任。
51due为留学生提供最好的作业代写服务，想获取更多paper代写范文，亲们可以进入主页 www.51due.com 为留学生提供paper辅导服务，了解详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ:800020041哟。-lc
In order to spare human beings the threats brought by climate change, the important international agreement---Kyoto Protocol, whose full name is Kyoto protocol of United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (short for UNFCCC), was passed in October of the year 1997 in Kyoto, Japan. It aims at the goal of ‘Limiting greenhouse gases concentrations in the atmosphere to a proper level and thus prevents drastic climate changes that would cause damages to human beings ’. The main greenhouse gas is carbon dioxide, so increasing countries has taken part into programs to avoid or at lease to reduce the carbon dioxide emissions. One of the popular and controversial measure is to enact a carbon cap (the maximum ceiling of carbon dioxide emission) and trade or a carbon tax, which is an economic leverage to adjust and affect people’s economic behaviors. This measure works because it adds the price of virtually everything probably by a small or large percentage since most of the things we buy or do now is related with energy to some extent. To consider this cost increase may change people’s way of doing things. Of course, there will be pros and cons when it comes to this topic, this paper will give a brief discussion in two sides around these issue reactions in the United States. After the brief analysis, the paper will present the personal point of view on this debatable topic.
Since the united States is a large country with its carbon dioxide emission taking up almost 25% of the global carbon dioxide emission, though all its population is only 3%-4% of the global total, actions that are taken by the American government will work as a wind indicator for other countries and have a far reaching influence on the rest of the world. Although having signed the Kyoto protocol in the year 1998, the Bush Administration refused to approve this Protocol in April of 2001 by saying that the policy to reduce greenhouse gases emission would have adverse effects on the US economy and that developing countries also have to bear similar obligations to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases (Tiberghien, Y., & Schreurs, M. A., 2007). But why is this case? Some people hold a negative opinion in this way: Limiting the carbon dioxide emission by an emission cap or carbon tax will require many people to change their current lifestyle in order to deal with the policy. And change of any kind will have a price to pay for. Under this added cost for various energies, products and services, people’s psychological expectation of living standard is lowered and hurt, the economically poor people in particular when they cannot afford any small increase in the cost of living. Apart from this, the current struggling and floundering economy in America in the aftermath of 2008 world financial crisis implies the moment is not the best time to implement such a policy of refraining purchasing of goods (because of energy limitation of carbon dioxide)when an aggressive policy of economy stimulus is in urgent need.
On the other hand, however, many people in the United America are on the other side of the balance, they are in strong favor of policy of carbon cap and trade and carbon tax. Because in their opinion, we human beings should and have to pay attention to the effects of human actions of using energy, whether it is good or bad. Contemplating carefully before taking actions is of prime significance. Needless to say, we should make the balance tipped to the good side, that is to say, human beings ought to reduce the price paid by them in the process to pursue a better and healthier economic development. People’s views on this sophisticated and controversial issue vary from person to person. Some said the price should be paid by the users of greenhouse gases, but how can people clearly make a distinction between the users and non-users of greenhouse gases? Besides, the final bad consequences will affect all human beings no matter if a specific person makes carbon dioxide emissions or not (Beschorner et al.,2000). Yes, this carbon tax or carbon cap policy works within the frame of free market economy, if a specific person or a company is doing well in reducing carbon emissions, there will be a certain incentive system, for example, money incentive or more tax rebate money in the operations of import and export, to be introduced and enforced. In fact, this is a very intriguing policy for many individuals and trade companies. On a further level, this economic method an effectively push businesses to move away from traditional energies and make use of increasingly more clear and alternative energies to reduce waste. The effect may not be obvious if only a few companies come to be engaged in this, but if more and more companies become involved in the new and alternative energies, the environment results will be amazing and encouraging. For example, if there is only one person thinking about protecting the environment all the time and doing a considerable number of actions to achieve it while others are just outsiders looking in without doing anything helpful and useful in order to reduce carbon dioxide, then the efficiency is very little. Only when every one of us in the world is fully aware of the seriousness and the importance of protecting the environment around can we benefit from it in a day. It is worth to mention that reducing carbon dioxide is a tough task which may need a long period of time to do. Besides, the development of clear energy itself is helpful to stimulate the economic growth. To view the larger economic landscape, this will be a great step forward for the whole economic structure transformation, since the clear energy usage percentage increases a lot in relation to the traditional fossil energy. Moreover, countering the seemingly forceful doubt that various production costs will add up when enforcing the carbon tax or emission cap, some people argue that the added costs may not be so much because the free market operators can always come up with some innovative solutions to reduce costs in one way or another, thus the actual benefits may probably surpass the added economic costs. That is absolutely true. Maybe at the first beginning, we are not able to see how much we are very likely to benefit from it, but as the time goes by, the good things will appear gradually.
In conclusion, taking all these factors into consideration, it is conspicuous that reducing carbon dioxide allows no delay, because human beings can not live without oxygen. Containing more CO2 in the air means containing less oxygen in the air for people to breathe. Meaning to say, if human beings do not take feasible and effective measures to protect our precious environment and reduce the emission of carbon dioxide, then we will have to pay for it in a day. And for that, human beings may not be able to endure. In addition, reducing carbon dioxide will be very helpful for our next generations; we should leave something good for them instead of ruining everything beautiful in the world. Reducing carbon dioxide is the first step that we have to take in order to refine our environment. Nature treats human beings with kindness and friendliness; therefore, we do not have any excuse not to pay attention to our own behavior to reduce the emission of carbon dioxide.
51Due原创版权郑重声明：原创范文源自编辑创作，未经官方许可，网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为，未经同意的情况下，51Due有权追究法律责任。
51due为留学生提供最好的作业代写服务，想获取更多paper代写范文，亲们可以进入主页 www.51due.com 为留学生提供paper辅导服务，了解详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ:800020041哟。-lc
