The_Case_for_Greatly_Increased_Immigration_Vrs_Timeout

The Case for Greatly Increased Immigration Vrs Timeout Contrasing Two Essays In the argumentative essay “The Case for Greatly Increased Immigration” written by Julian L. Stein and also the essay “Timeout” written by Dan Stein, they are both trying to convince the audience to take their side. Stein and Simon both have different views on the subject of immigration, Simon wants the immigration rate to be increased and on the other hand, Stein wants to stop it all together until the issues are under control. Not only does Simon have evidence to justify his facts, but he also uses a number of reasons and explanations. Although Stein has some strong points, he seems to use his facts in negative ways. Simon’s essay seems to be more effective in persuading the audience to increase immigration. A strong point that makes Simon’s essay more effective than Stein’s, is that almost every one of his statements and facts are backed up by some sort of evidence. In both of the essays they talk about the number of immigrants that arrived in the U.S. in 1991. Simon said that there were about 600,00 to 750,000 admitted in that year (457). Simon also states where he increased, immigration, timeout, essay, immigrants, stein, simon, reasons, facts, example, effective, one, number, natives, makes, both, strong, states, point, explains, audience, another, written, taking, points, numbers, less, just, jobs, issues, hand, control, about, 471, year