On Causal Relations between Mental Organizer--论文代写范文精选

51Due论文代写网精选essay代写范文：“On Causal Relations between Mental Organizer ” 这项研究的目的是研究精神组织者之间的关系,在心理过程中,通过观察和社会环境的研究，对每个行为的分类系统与矩阵数据进行了分析,找出因果动态类型的根源，评估可靠性、主体性和观察有效性。这篇心理essay代写范文讲述了精神组织者的关系。结果表明,因果关系不同，原因是不稳定的。此外,流程是串联的，他们下降在并行模式，当任务变得更加困难。目前的研究是一系列研究，所谓的执行系统一直受到人们的关注。

Abstract 
The purpose of the research was to study the relationships between mental organizers, action under mental process, and social environment through observation. A category system for each behavior was constructed and data were analyzed with matrices to find out kinds of root causes in causal dynamic. Reliability, subjectivity, and validity of observation were assessed. The coefficient of reliability was 0.937. The observation had about 11% subjectivity, and the frequencies were in the categories where they should be, mainly. Results indicate that there occurs causal variety. The causes are not stable. As an entity, the results show that it is possible to tackle mind processes through the causation. Furthermore, the processes are in series but they drop by in a parallel mode when the task becomes more difficult. However, the mindamic seems to have the greatest possible number of the degrees of freedom, simultaneously. 
Key words: mindamic, mindition, mental organizer, dynamic causation, action under a mental process, social environment, root cause, serial processing, parallel processing, complexity.

Introduction
The present research is sequel to a series of researches where the so-called executive system in mindamic has been under scrutiny. The results have been distinguishable. Shortly put, the first system was called the croupier. It proved to be inadequate because the person transforms the mental processes before overt behavior. The behavioral changes can become quite different. Therefore, the transmuter was the next executive function assumed to produce different kinds of mind processes. However, the conceptualization of the transmuter was too narrow to cover diversity of the mental processes. Therefore, the present executive system is called the mental organizer because it has wider intensions and extensions as the causal dynamic between both the mind and inner, and overt behavior. The focus of the present research is on the causal processes or the causes as the processes, as you wish. It is assumed that the mental organizer causes action that takes place under a mind process, and the action connects with the social environment or the persons that are significant in the very context the person behaves. This time the hypothesis is in the form of a question. What kinds of causal processes prevail between the mental organizer, the action under the mind processes, and the social environment? 

The social On Causal 4 environment occurs in aggregate. The mental organizer includes in the following processes: classification, sort, group, collection, transfiguration, transformation, metamorphosis, and transmutation. The actions under the mind processes are. The person solves the task alone; so, he or she is in the process of experiential mindition. The person contacts with the social environment to confirm the solution; it means being under the shape mindition. The person contacts with the social environment to complete the solution; the question is about being under the initial mindition. The person contacts with the social environment to find the solution; consequently, it is an empty mindition. The person finds no solution with or without the social environment; thus, the mindition remains a hazy one. The Balesian categories through 4 to 9 were reserved for the behavior of the social environment. The categories were. 4. Gives suggestion, direction, implying autonomy for other. 5. Gives opinion, evaluation, analysis, and expresses feeling, wish. 6. Gives orientation, information, repeats, clarifies, confirms. 7. Asks for orientation, information, repetition, and confirmation. 8. Asks for opinion, evaluation, analysis, and expression of feeling. 9. Asks for suggestion, direction, and possible ways of action. In the course of time, there have emerged activities.

Theoretic Floor 
Recently, new results between genes and environment indicate a continual interaction between the genes and their respective environment. The newer conception offers a starting point for the examination. Evidently, an organic configuration of the mind takes place during the early days. The direction of the change is from holistic behavior towards more organized one. According to Fischbach (1992, p. 14), the mind is an emergent property, possibly. Derivation of the mind from brain activities has possibility to be a flaw. The reason is, the brain function as growth base but with time, the mind becomes more independent on its base. The derivation, however, is a one-way ‘ticket’. Furthermore, the doctrine of complexity makes reduction of the mind to the brain activities less probable. In principle, the only person who is able to see into his or her mind is the person in question. Scanning devices have developed in a greater amount with their markers but a person is not able to see into the mind of another person. Orange color indicates high activity. So what? 

As with the On Causal 6 Mind itself it does not grow and develop in void. The mind needs environment(s) from whom the social environment is the most important one (Vilmos Csanyi, personal information). Incidentally, modern persons emphasize a holistic approach to the relations between the persons, things, and matters. Consequently, shallow childishness diffuses because children are holistic and unorganized with their thinking. More seriously, it might be good to have some corresponding dynamic organization with reality. Most seriously, there are persons more significant than other who influence in the development of the mind. Utmost seriously, biological maturation processes pave the way to the mind evolvement in duration of 25 years. However, after the maturation comes over ripeness. 

Moreover, an organized dynamic body of knowledge lacks what comes to the mind? As to the processes that seem to be, important between the minds processes diffusion or propagation of ‘mental semantics’ is the 1st one. It makes the needful processes active from incentive(s). Absorption is the next one; it means that a process receives messages but does not send them. Assimilation by definition fuses two or more processes. A fact is noteworthy in this context. A human being exchanges energy, and information with his or her timely close environment according to the definition of the open dynamic system. In contrast, the differentiation between form and contents are an artifact. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce a conceptualization that fuses information and energy. It is infergy because energy is available instantly for utilization of information and for the direct, quick access into the mind of one’s own. A process that is not passing is accumulation of experiences through experimentation to experientially organized mindamic. 

The former experiences work out the development of the process system or the mind. The mind as the process system offers a few advantages. There occurs dynamic interaction between the processes by the definition of the open system. The processes and their relations are measurable. The truism all affect all is a fallacy because the minds of the persons anchor values, and valuations. The values, and valuations produce priorities, and preferences in behavior because of their practical nature. Reversion to the experiential cumulating, it is rather natural that the former experiences direct the mindamic in novel situations. In this case, the processes are elastic because the former experience may lead to solutions or it can lead astray to no solutions. So the processes to be efficient they are to be plastic or irreversible. A backward analysis is not possible because of the evolvement of complexity. The classification of the mind processes during the series of the research has been more or less successful.

After that, he or she transforms behavior. Next, the behaver collects the necessary information, and contacts with the social environment to find the solution. In the contact, the behaver transmutes. The transmutation makes the behaver to construct an organized mindition, and to modify it in the contact. The actions under the initial mindition, the organized mindition, and the empty mindition cause back into the mental organizer. The action under the initial mindition works up the collection of the behaver. The action under the empty mindition makes the behaver to transform. Furthermore, the action under the empty mindition converts the transformation of the behaver into another kind of run. The social environment directs the behaver to transmute, mostly. 

The same thing concerns the evaluation and the analysis, the asking for and giving information that make the behaver to regroup the task. Subsequently, the social environment directs the finding of the solution in minor way. The social environment evaluates and analyses, asks for and gives information to the behaver for the regroup, for the right solution. In the 5th dyna in Table 9, the behaver groups the task stimuli. The behaver collects the grouped stimuli, and transforms. The behaver utilizes the transmuter to alter the inner behavior. The overt behavior continues as before. In On Causal 33 contrast, the behaver changes the mindition from the organized one into the initial one. The change makes the behaver to collect information more workably. The behaver links also the action under the empty mindition with the collector. The social environment responds to the completion giving direction for further behavior, mostly. Simultaneously, the social environment evaluates and analyses, and asks for and gives information for the behaver to utilize the transformer. The last mentioned behaviors of the social environment bring forth the behaver to collect the stimuli, again. Moreover, the social environment directs the behaver to modify his or her mental mode, in a minor quantity. 

As regards the value vector the 1st dyna produces the aesthetic value with the job, religious value with the hobbies, and the social value with the job, again. Therefore, in work, the behaver emphasizes warmhearted individualism, and in the hobbies, the behaver participates some kind of belief system. In the 2nd dyna, the behaver wants to find the real aspect of the task joined with optimum utility. The hobbies orient to the utility, too. After the 3rd dyna, the utility emphasizes further both in work and in the hobbies. The social value raises its function. The behaver manages in the 4th dyna with the utility function but takes into account of whom to contact. The behaver gets also a small impact from the utility of the job. After the last dyna the utility is the On Causal 34 strongest both in the job and in the hobbies. The decisive persons include in the behavior of the subject, too. In theory, the results can be bound with the former concepts of propagation, absorption, and assimilation. So a propagator is the start process, an assimilator is the intermediate process, and an absorber is the process where processing stops. Thus the propagator `ignites´ processing between processes. The assimilator conveys modified information during the processing. The absorber dissipates received information. Therefore, the mindamic can be approached as a process system with three kinds of processes that are enough, probably.

51Due网站原创范文除特殊说明外一切图文著作权归51Due所有；未经51Due官方授权谢绝任何用途转载或刊发于媒体。如发生侵犯著作权现象，51Due保留一切法律追诉权。（essay代写)
更多essay代写范文欢迎访问我们主页 www.51due.com 当然有essay代写需求可以和我们24小时在线客服 QQ:800020041 联系交流。-X（essay代写)