代写范文

留学资讯

写作技巧

论文代写专题

服务承诺

资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达

51Due提供Essay,Paper,Report,Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导,同时涵盖Personal Statement,转学申请等留学文书代写。

51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标

私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企,高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展

积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈

作业代写:Moral paradox

2018-06-07 来源: 51due教员组 类别: Paper范文

下面为大家整理一篇优秀的paper代写范文- Moral paradox,供大家参考学习,这篇论文讨论了道德悖论。道德悖论最早由学者提出,学者将道德悖论看作是一种很特殊的逻辑悖论。后来学者发现,道德悖论错在了方法的借用和本题理论的混淆。道德悖论现象,其实指的是人在进行道德选择和价值实现的过程中同时出现善果与恶果的自相矛盾现象, 这种现象是客观存在的,不依人的意志为转移的事实,具有客观性和普遍性。

Moral paradox,道德悖论,essay代写,paper代写,北美作业代写

Moral paradox is widely used in today's society, especially in the scope of ethics. But people's definition of moral paradox is not very clear and definite, and there are many problems. Therefore, it is urgent to explore the definition of moral paradox. This article analyzes the phenomena and causes of moral paradox. So that we can understand more clearly and accurately what the moral paradox is.

Paradox is often called paradox in physics. In English, they are the same word, paradox, or paradox. Of course, from a strict point of view, paradox is only one kind of paradox, and it is the most important one. Among natural scientists, paradox is now almost synonymous with paradox. The so-called paradox, the literal understanding of the "false fallacy", is not correct on the face of it, but in fact, it is correct, that is, a kind of statement like "paradox". One is the paradoxical contradiction in its original sense. Contrary, contrary, contrary to the meaning of sorrow. If one comes to a conclusion through analysis of certain events that one is thinking about, however, another conclusion is drawn by another analytical method. Therefore, people will be trapped in a dilemma of contradictions, unable to give a clear and reasonable explanation of the incident. This constitutes a paradox. Second, there are some really wrong assertions, which seem to be reasonable and correct after the superficial analysis of non-deepening layer, that is, "plausible but not true", which is the sophistry we usually talk about.

The concept of moral paradox was proposed by the famous scholar lu jie, who used the word "moral paradox" in her moral crisis: a modern paradox. In his first research on the phenomenon of moral paradox, Mr. Lu jie once regarded moral paradox as a special logical paradox. Later, Mr. Lu jie found that the mistake was the confusion between the borrowing of methods and the theory of the subject. Moral paradox phenomenon, refers to the people in the process of moral choice and value realization is contradictory phenomena of good and evil at the same time, this kind of phenomenon is objective existence, the fact that not governed by man's will. It is objective and universal. Based on this basic fact, the causes of moral paradox are analyzed and understood.

Famous scholar professor zhang thinks, strictly logical paradox should have three elements, namely the "acknowledged correct background knowledge", "careful and correct the logic", "can create contradictions equivalent type". The concept of moral paradox is borrowed from this definition, which means that any contradiction phenomenon called moral paradox should meet these three conditions. In the field of studying moral paradox in the future, we should stick to the method proposed by professor zhang jianjun, only having three structural elements of paradox can be called moral paradox. In this sense, we call the moral paradox a special kind of logical paradox and attribute it to the family of logical paradoxes. It is justifiable to judge whether it is a strict or quasi-paradoxical, a broad or a narrow paradox within a family. However, it is not correct to limit moral paradox to the scope of logical paradox research or exclude it from the scope of logical paradox research. Method can borrow, however, is not the transplantation of ontology, to borrow the moral paradox is logical paradox, the method of logical paradox can not transplant the subject, see it as a logical paradox derivative "is a kind of special logical paradox" is not appropriate, they are not the relationship between "species". Logical paradox is a phenomenon of thinking, and its "logical mistake" belongs to "correct thought mistake" -- because it is right, so it is wrong. Moral paradox is a practical phenomenon, and its "logical error" is a "correct choice error" -- because the right choice, so the wrong choice. Is, the moral paradox is essentially the result "line", referred to as "the theory of" because its "contrast" is that people use correct moral background knowledge "in", "careful and correct logic deduction" and "theory" of moral evaluation.

Moral paradox is formed and presented in the process of social moral value selection and realization. To some extent, moral paradox should be the paradox of moral value choice and realization of moral value. Therefore, moral paradox belongs to the category of moral practice in essence, and is at the structural level of moral choice and moral evaluation in the knowledge theory system of ethics.

The quality condition of the subject and the realistic condition that the subject has, when he wants to implement the good heart and shows the situation that his efforts are not enough, bad consequences will occur. In the process of selecting value, the subject itself tends to meet the requirements of the public, but after its own implementation, it finds that it is not equivalent, which is also a reason for the paradox.

In the process of selecting the realization of the subject's value, there are complex advantages and disadvantages in the specific ethical situation. There are two kinds of different situations, one is the same of the favorable factors and unfavorable factors, namely people usually say the body of the behavior, the reality of the environment and has its own conditions is different, will affect his mentality and the results of the implementation of the one thing that would have been different. When the subject considers that the event is beneficial to him, he will tend to favor the desired result in the process of implementation. Therefore, the start and implementation of good will have different results. When there is a conflict between the two, there is a moral paradox. Want to avoid paradox truly, this is not transfer with the human will, it has certain universality and objectivity.

The subject responsible for the causes of different moral paradoxes is the actor who chooses behavior, that is, the party involved in the strange cycle of moral paradoxes. In the evaluation of moral paradox, it is impossible for the subject to feel the psychological experience of others and the emotional experience of others. If you think you deserve it, you must get it. The subject has no objective consideration of the occurrence of things, so it lacks certain attention to others. Especially in this society, people are so important to their own gain and loss that they care about the immediate interests. Often the self-evaluation is not very objective and accurate, with a certain degree of self-nature.

At present, it is generally accepted that this paradox originates from "self-referential", so it has formed a solution to the paradox: eliminating self-referential. Most subsequent paradoxical solutions follow this pattern. Russell made an in-depth study of this paradox. He first tried to solve it by using proposition stratification, but failed. It turned out that the problem had raised concerns about paradoxes. Susan huck what is given according to this problem is the basic standard of paradox, her standards have been put forward by the academic circles generally accepted, namely must be independent of the evidence for causing the paradox of the conclusion of this expression or inference principle.

51due留学教育原创版权郑重声明:原创paper代写范文源自编辑创作,未经官方许可,网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为,未经同意的情况下,51Due有权追究法律责任。主要业务有essay代写、assignment代写、paper代写服务。

51due为留学生提供最好的paper代写服务,亲们可以进入主页了解和获取更多paper代写范文 提供北美作业代写服务,详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ:800020041。

上一篇:北美作业代写:Intouchables 下一篇:作业代写:The influence of English