Logsdon's view of corporate citizenship

下面为大家整理一篇优秀的assignment代写范文- Logsdon's view of corporate citizenship，供大家参考学习，这篇论文讨论了罗格斯顿的企业公民观。罗格斯顿通过剖析政治形态下的“公民”观点，以三个视角下的公民观为基点，检验现实中的企业是否适用于公民的基本特性，得出结论。在罗格斯顿看来，公民观是一个随着时代进步而不断发展的概念。他借用政治形态中的公民权理论，从个人公民逐步推出其他现代意义的公民观，即三视角公民观，分别为个人视角下的公民观、社区视角下的公民观、全球化视野下的公民观。

Rutgers through analyzing the political form of "citizen" point of view, from three perspectives to the citizens under the view as the basis, the enterprise reality check whether is suitable for the basic characteristic of the citizens, came to the conclusion that the enterprises are not citizens of the "real", but based on the need and civil service for the society, the enterprise as a citizen of appendages, "the second citizen". Logsdon's view of corporate citizenship is of great significance to the new trend of corporate citizenship theory and provides a paradigm for us to judge the role of enterprises.

On the premise of the theory of corporate social responsibility, the concept of corporate citizenship is derived from the two mutually defined concepts of "enterprise" and "citizen". According to the literal meaning, the concept of corporate citizenship follows the concept of "citizen" and regards the enterprise as a quasi-personal identity. Logsdon, as the master of the theory of corporate citizenship, points out the direction for the further study of the theory of corporate citizenship by his interpretation of the concept of citizenship and the concept of corporate citizenship.

In logsdon's view, the concept of citizenship is a concept that develops with the progress of The Times. He borrowed the theory of civil rights in the political form and gradually introduced other modern views of citizenship from individual citizens, namely the three perspectives of citizenship, namely the view of citizenship from the perspective of individual, the view of citizenship from the perspective of community, and the view of citizenship from the perspective of globalization.

The view of citizenship from the perspective of the individual is characterized by the maximization of civil freedom. In the aspect of rights, citizens enjoy the right to pursue their own goals freely without interfering with the interests of others. At the compulsory level, the society does not require the citizens to perform altruistic ACTS, but only to comply with the relevant regulations in accordance with their personal interests. It can be seen that the concept of citizenship from the perspective of individuals emphasizes that citizens enjoy supreme freedom within their own activities, and there is a one-way connection between citizens and the society.

Community citizens under the view of view, the perspective view of citizens is to emphasize the characteristics of civil rights and obligations of equivalence, after qualification of members of the community is made of a whole, the citizen has the right to participate in community member qualification rule-making process, and enjoys rights given by the community, at the same time, citizens must take the corresponding responsibility in practice in order to promote the benign development of the community. It can be seen that citizens under the concept of community have a sense of community, and there is a two-way interaction between citizens and the society. While the society gives citizens a harmonious and orderly environment, citizens are also actively giving back to the society.

Citizenship view from the perspective of globalization, which is characterized by respecting and creating all conditions to give full play to citizens' autonomy and initiative in participating in social affairs, and effectively guaranteeing citizens' right to freedom. Due to the flow and expansion of production factors and trade rules in the process of globalization, the interaction between citizens and society has broken through national boundaries and extended to the whole world. Therefore, the key issue of the concept of citizenship from the perspective of globalization is the integration of heterogeneous factors across cultural boundaries, which makes it extremely urgent to maintain the autonomy of citizens to participate in social affairs and balance the interests of citizens.

Logsdon verifies it from two aspects: one is based on three perspectives of citizenship, to test whether enterprises are applicable to the relevant characteristics of citizens from different perspectives; The second is to further demonstrate the rationality of the conclusion by discussing the legal and moral status of enterprises.

Personal perspective of citizens and enterprises under the new classical economic theory is very similar, for members of the organization, they have only conducive to the fulfillment of their personal rights duties, such as specific action only when shareholders think will conducive to his personal purpose, they will guide enterprises play the role of citizens. Companies may play the role of "citizens", but the motivation is not social benefit, but merely personal purpose. In reality, enterprises are social production organizations developed with a certain historical and cultural background, and cannot exist in isolation in daily production and operation activities. The economic influence of enterprises gradually penetrates into politics, culture, education and other fields, and enterprises have to consider the impact of their decision-making behaviors on the society. Therefore, logsdon believes that citizenship from the perspective of the individual does not apply to real enterprises.

From the perspective of community, citizens become members of the community based on their common historical background and values. They have a strong sense of community, and their loyalty to the community even goes beyond their personal interests. In this view, companies are capable of acting as socially responsible "citizens" and are willing to perform their duties for the benefit of the community. To some extent, this view is in line with the concept of CSR, that is, enterprises will consider the social problems caused by their decisions or behaviors, and try to avoid or compensate for negative social externalities by fulfilling their social responsibilities. The transformation from the personal perspective to the community perspective is a key step in repositioning the relationship between enterprises and society. The enterprise from the community perspective is endowed with political, economic and social significance. Therefore, enterprises can become corporate citizens from the perspective of community.

Citizens from a global perspective should not only conform to the norms of their local communities, but also respond to the universal rules of a globalized society. With the factors of production globalization, market globalization and trade rules the speeding up of globalization, multinational companies in a wider, higher level deepened on the global economy, politics and social life in the field of penetration, corresponding, the expectations of society to a certain extent, also affect the enterprise management decision and the value idea, enterprise and society more closely link. Logsdon believes that this view of citizenship is suitable for the development environment of today's enterprises, which can become corporate citizens in the context of globalization.

By analyzing the three perspectives of citizenship, logsdon believes that enterprises can become corporate citizens from the perspective of community and globalization, which is far from enough. Therefore, logsdon further explores the legal and moral characteristics of citizens to determine whether enterprises can become "real" citizens.

"Citizen" implies membership granted by the political sphere. Membership is the essence of citizenship and has its corresponding rights and responsibilities, so citizenship cannot be directly applied to enterprises unless required by a regulation based on a specific purpose and statute. The arguments are as follows: first, according to the interpretation of American jurisprudence, human beings are divided into natural persons and "persons" artificially created, while enterprises are generally considered to be "artificially created". To some extent, this gives the enterprise the status of legitimacy. Second, corporate statutes in the United States provide that corporations and citizens tend to be similar in certain rights, such as residency. The residency rule, which allows companies to appeal and Sue within jurisdictions, is one of the precedents for treating companies as legitimate citizens. Finally, the U.S. constitution provides for corporations' rights to speech, privacy, and limited distribution of property. Enterprise is the law in order to meet the demands of human and artificial abstract entity, therefore, rutgers thinks law awarded "enterprise citizen" status is based on practical considerations, which allows companies to better serve human fundamental purpose, even though the current law does not give "enterprise citizen" could or should be normative interpretation, but it may be set up by some legal rules and define our argument to move one step forward.

In rutgers, point of view, enterprise is a moral behavior but not a moral person, its support according to the following: one is the enterprise is an organization composed of people, but the enterprise itself is not a natural person entity, also the lack of human inner personality, therefore, the enterprise can't like humans are endowed with corresponding moral right, also not bound by a large number of ethics, as a natural person enterprise isn't a moral person; Second, although an enterprise does not have the consciousness of a natural person, it can act like a human being, which will produce corresponding results. Therefore, it should assume moral responsibility for its behavior. Logsdon argues that firms should focus on the output of their actions rather than their motives, and that their actions are an appropriate subject for ethical evaluation. In short, the rutgers, from a moral stratification analysis enterprise are not citizens of the "real", the characteristics of the citizens directly grafting is not applicable to the enterprise, but considering the enterprise is a collection of people constitute the internal equivalent, these individuals willing to collaboration to achieve the purpose of service for human activities, therefore, enterprise is endowed with a moral identity, namely enterprise should undertake its behavior moral responsibility.

In logsdon's view, corporations are agents of citizens and society. The purpose of the society is to ensure the better survival and development of citizens, while enterprises, as agents, serve the needs of individuals and collectives, playing a role similar to intermediary, seeking a balance between unlimited human needs and extremely few social resources. In order to meet the needs of its survival and development, citizens will grant the right to the enterprise at the same time will also give the enterprise an important mission. But in spite of this, citizens are not the same entity as corporations; they are agents, granting corporations specific rights only when humans and society need them. Therefore, logsdon proposed the idea that corporations are "second citizens", that corporations are subordinated to the supremacy of natural citizenship. For example, in the United States, corporate citizens can be granted legal rights but nothing else. Corporations have the right to participate in certain political actions but not the right to vote in elections. In short, logsdon emphasizes that enterprises are not real citizens, but on the basis of practical considerations of providing better services for human beings, enterprises are regarded as "second citizens" subordinated to real natural citizens, and enterprises are endowed with specific rights and shoulder the important mission of providing services for human beings.

Logsdon's interpretation of corporate citizenship points the way for us to think about the orientation of corporate citizenship, but the fragmentation of his views does not form a consistent and complete system, which cannot be justified. Nevertheless, in the context of globalization, transnational enterprises have penetrated into the economic, political and social fields today, and their views provide a paradigm for us to distinguish the role of enterprises in the global society, and provide methodological guidance for us to construct a modern view of corporate citizenship. In addition, according to logsdon's view of corporate citizenship, we can also get a lot of enlightenment. For example, in the context of globalization, enterprises should not only coordinate the relationship with the community, but also deal with the integration of heterogeneous factors in the cross-cultural perspective. On the one hand, as an independent economic entity, enterprises have the right to create wealth and enjoy equal protection under the law. On the other hand, enterprises should also fulfill their social responsibilities equal to their rights.

51due留学教育原创版权郑重声明：原创assignment代写范文源自编辑创作，未经官方许可，网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为，未经同意的情况下，51Due有权追究法律责任。主要业务有assignment代写、essay代写、paper代写服务。

51due为留学生提供最好的assignment代写服务，亲们可以进入主页了解和获取更多assignment代写范文 提供美国作业代写服务，详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ：800020041。