National_Security_Vs._Freedom_Of_The_Press

National Security Vs. Freedom Of The Press National Security vs. Freedom of Press Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. ~~First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution Those words are a portion of one of the most important documents in America’s history, the Bill of Rights. Within this document are civil rights and liberties, which afford the citizens of the United States freedoms and rights that cannot be removed. However for all its virtues this manuscript is somewhat ambiguous. Along with this ambiguity comes the debate over whether or not certain bits of this immortal text should be taken less literally. One of these pieces belongs to the ideals of the first amendment “freedom . . . of the press.” Ideally freedom of the press is the liberty to print or to otherwise distribute information, in print, by broadcasting, or through electronic media, without prior restraints such as licensing requirements or content review and without later punishment for what is said. Freedom of the press, which has press, freedom, government, should, national, papers, security, one, first, amendment, administration, times, publication, president, people, pentagon, order, documents, court, new, kara, executive, united, right, public, over, information, debate, corrente, page, considered, case, bush, york, states, speech