Cloning_is_Ethically_and_Morally_Wrong

Cloning is Ethically and Morally Wrong The question shakes us all to our very souls. For humans to consider the cloning of one another forces them all to question the very concepts of right and wrong that make them all human. The cloning of any species, whether they be human or non-human, is ethically and morally wrong. Scientists and ethicists alike have debated the implications of human and non-human cloning extensively since 1997 when scientists at the Roslin Institute in Scotland produced Dolly. No direct conclusions have been drawn, but compelling arguments state that cloning of both human and non-human species results in harmful physical and psychological effects on both groups. The following issues dealing with cloning and its ethical and moral implications will be addressed: cloning of human beings would result in severe psychological effects in the cloned child, and that the cloning of non-human species subjects them to unethical or moral treatment for human needs. The possible physical damage that could be done if human cloning became a reality is obvious when one looks at the sheer loss of life that occurred before the birth of Dolly. Less than ten percent of the initial transfers survive to be healthy creatures. There were 277 trial human, cloning, humans, non-human, one, animals, 1997, wrong, treatment, scientists, child, time, species, psychological, genes, dolly, cloned, both, very, unethical, sheer, september, physical, opinion, moral, march, loss, life, less, implications, harms, expert, ethical, effects, children, available, online, 1998, uniqueness, transgenic, ten, technology, survive, subjects, since, sense, self, same, roslin, right, question