作业代写：Diderot and buvaro

下面为大家整理一篇优秀的essay代写范文- Diderot and buvaro，供大家参考学习，这篇论文讨论了狄德罗与布瓦洛。布瓦洛和狄德罗是西方文艺理论界不同阶段的代表人物，在他们各自的文艺理论中，关于艺术与自然的论述，有很多异同之处。布瓦洛认为文艺要表现理性，就必须模仿自然，并且他认为这才是文艺的基本任务。而狄德罗认为凡是客观存在于自然界的一切事物，都有它发展的一定规律性。

Boileau is one of the representative figures of the western classical literary theory in the 17th century. His magnum opus is the art of poetry, written in verse in four chapters. The first chapter is an overview, which describes that reason is the most basic principle of poetry creation and criticism, and makes a general explanation of the general law of poetry creation and criticism. The second chapter is about the minor poetry, which includes hymns, Lamentations and pastoral songs. The third chapter is about the main poetic forms, including tragedy, comedy and epic. The fourth chapter discusses the moral cultivation of the writer. Through this book, we can see that the literary theory system of buvaro has been very complete, which basically represents the highest level of western literary theory in this period. Diderot was one of the most outstanding representatives of western enlightenment thinkers in the 18th century, a French materialist thinker and a famous writer. His theory of literature and art is mainly embodied in his two books. One is on the dramatic arts and the other is on painting. Diderot, as one of the prominent leaders of the encyclopaedia school, also constructed the theory system of literature and art very tightly.

Buvaro and diderot are two representatives of western literary theory at different stages. In their respective literary theory, there are many similarities and differences in their discourses on art and nature. The formation of such similarities and differences is the result of historical background and the inevitable result of the development of literary theory.

For example, boileau believed that in order to show rationality in literature and art, one must imitate nature. And he thinks this is the basic task of literature and art. The classicists believe that truth is nature, and buvaro, as the epitome of classicism, preserves this doctrine. He said that only true is beautiful, only true is lovely. And nature is true, you feel it at touch. To seek beauty, we must seek truth and imitate nature. Beauty, truth, reason and nature are one and inseparable, according to boileau. "We" can never be separated from nature, he said. However, there is a big difference between his "imitation of nature" and the traditional views of ancient Greece. Boileau's theory is based on rationalism. He refers to the natural as long as the things reflected in the common sense of things, human nature in human nature, especially natural human nature. To imitate nature is to imitate natural humanity. He also divided natural human nature into three types: one original personality, two types of personality, three stereotypes of character.

In his later years, boileau had more contact with the upper class in France. In 1684, he entered the French academy under the patronage of Louis xiv. Therefore, in his art theory, he naturally defended the aristocracy and sang praises. Secular life in the city and in the country, he argues, is excluded from imitating nature. Those lives were "humble and vile", a far cry from "elegant and meticulous". He thinks that the only thing poets should study and imitate is "city" and "court", in which "court" is the focus of imitation. That is to say, it is important and worth studying to express the "natural human nature" of emperors and nobles.

Diderot's theory of "imitating nature" is aimed at the problem of natural affectation from the point of abstract reason. In his opinion, realistic imitation of reality is a basic principle of artistic creation. The more perfect the imitation is, the more it can conform to various reasons, and "we" will feel more satisfied. From this point of view, diderot and buvaro's opinion is unified. They all believe that the task of literature and art is to truly reflect nature.

But the difference is that diderot asked for a much higher degree of reflection of nature than buvaro. He believed that everything objectively existed in nature had certain regularity of its development. There is nothing in nature that is not right, and any form, whether good or bad, has its cause. In his opinion, although classicism also advocates "imitation of nature", but that nature has been feudalized and standardized, is a contradiction created by artificiality, is hypocritical, does not occur in the nature of the action, is correct, artificial. Diderot believed that what art needs is uncarved and turbulent nature, because this kind of nature is full of primitive breath and exuberant vitality, and is full of the "huge and rough and savage boldness" that art needs. This is a very different idea from buvaro's. We can see that diderot expressed his "imitation of nature" from the standpoint of the common people or, more accurately, the bourgeoisie, which is fundamentally opposed to buvaro from the standpoint of the feudal ruling class.

Diderot also believed that art is selective in its imitation of nature. It cannot be satisfied by depicting the appearance of things, but should process the original natural things. Diderot believed that artists should have a sense of talent, imagination and poetry. To reduce and add something normal to nature, the art required to imitate nature should be based on and beyond nature. Moreover, diderot's idea of combining truth, virtue and beauty is also unique. He believed that kindness is the foundation of beauty, and that beauty in art does not exist without natural truth and moral goodness.

We can now think so, compared with the cloth the warrens diderot's theory of nature is a big step forward, first of all, he is sure to imitate nature must oppose already feudalization of the program, just eyes focused on the noble, and neglect the existence of the grassroots, so creating beauty is not perfect, it is not a sound. Diderot's proposition is to fight against the decadent feudal literature and art system with "primitive" and "rough" beauty, which can be said to be progressive at that time. Secondly, diderot paid attention to the imitation of nature, which was selective and required the unification of truth, virtue and beauty. This dialectical philosophical concept was a great step forward compared with buvaro's. In short, the warrens of imitating nature theory of literature and art exist serious defects, to art imitating nature of the restrictions and regulations greatly narrow the scope of literature and art reflect reality, and diderot as a representative of the enlightenment thinker of the 18th century outstanding against cloth warrens of literary theory defects and puts forward the new "imitate nature" is a major advance of this theory. There is no denying that diderot's theory also has some shortcomings. For example, the art he advocates should be primitive and barbaric, which is not comprehensive in today's eyes.

In any case, both buvaro and diderot, as pioneers of literary and art theory in their times, made important contributions to the development of literary and art theory at that time and provided necessary channels for us to understand the development of western literary and art theory.

51due留学教育原创版权郑重声明：原创essay代写范文源自编辑创作，未经官方许可，网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为，未经同意的情况下，51Due有权追究法律责任。主要业务有essay代写、assignment代写、paper代写、作业代写服务。

51due为留学生提供最好的essay代写服务，亲们可以进入主页了解和获取更多essay代写范文 提供代写服务，详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ：800020041。