对电影《十二怒汉》的解读-论文代写范文

美国essay论文精选范文：“对电影《十二怒汉》的解读”，这篇论文讨论了电影《十二怒汉》。美国电影《十二怒汉》讲的是一个1比11，最后1胜利的故事。影片讲述的是一个少年被认为有弑父嫌疑，在法庭上种种证据都指向有罪的情况下，十二位陪审员中有一位却展开怀疑，最终局面戏剧性地扭转，陪审团达成一致，认定少年无罪。而电影中所展现的强大个人力量给很多观众留下了深刻的印象。

As the film's Director, xideni·lumaite said: "Although it is often said that the film's ultimate aim is just entertainment, but I believe we can go further: it not only stimulates thinking and conscience can lead people to look at it from another angle. "Starting from the directing debut of the 12 angry men, to the last of the film before the devil knows you're dead so far, he repeated criticism of corruption, justice, torture the good and evil, so called" Director's conscience, conscience of the rulers. "

Although the 12 angry men in 1957 Oscar-race defeat in the bridge on the River Kwai, but as the classic representative of the Sidney Lumet film, decades past its reputation rises higher and higher. The storyline of the film clear, tells the story of a young boy is thought to have killed his father suspected, all the evidence points to guilt in court cases, one of the 12 jurors had doubts end dramatically reversed, the jury agreed, finds that juvenile not guilty.

From the movie itself, its technique is unique in the context of a simple room, 12 characters and dialogue alone action to prop up the entire film, rhythm and lines to write long a considerable success. In this movie, we recognize the United States justice system an important part – the jury system and its mantra of "rather let 1000, not wrong to kill a" spirit. It is this respect for life and care, the story of the 12 angry men was able to continue, which on the eighth juror with one enemy 11, courage and perseverance of the tide.

What is one powers? It is from the so-called "consensus" effect to begin. Voice refers to all say the same thing, in other words, when faced with a problem or something when evaluation is needed, other people before you have expressed are similar to each other, but disagree with your opinion, then you change of mind is will be quite likely that "speak with one voice" effect. Someone did the experiment, all members, as long as the one person expressed their different views, then the herd will greatly reduce the likelihood of other people, even in only 14 members of the experiment, 13 members of which were unanimous, and only under the conditions of a member does not have an echo! Even more interesting is that even if this member does not make any objection, but remain silent, its effect is also remarkable. Meanwhile, they found that "dissident" comments can impact even destroyed most of the established consensus, and people who dare to express his true thoughts for later play a significant role in encouraging. Which shows the herd just the opposite effect, namely "power of one".

Was had said movie 12 anger Han in the, only create records of a movie scene, in this as single stage of room in, 12 bit jurors staged has a out wonderful of drama, and left audience impression most deep of is eighth, jurors to a enemy 11, and eventually get victory of this process has, in this process in the not only show has eighth, jurors extraordinary of wit and calm of mind, also from on the performance out has a a people of power not underestimated.

Movie a began, on through dialogue in the of details told has we, this is a stake killing parent of murder case, numerous of crime ex, unique of crime weapon, two bit witnesses of ironclad proof and accused lawyer pale of defended, several jurors think has no dispute of statements table seems to are in told we, suspects was justice, seems to has is Board Shang nail of things has, now on, with see everyone consistent through has. But the 12 jurors, only one person feel uncomfortable, this is the eighth juror, in his view, we must put a suspect on his execution by thinking, even if he had a little bit of innocence may be, we should also take this inquiry more and in turn to consider the reasonableness of not guilty. 11:1, how disparity of gap, according to minority obey most of principles, such a people of idea, completely can was people ignored regardless of, but so, if he is truth of voice, so must on will was kill in majority of tyranny zhixia has, but movie and no to this on end, according to United States of judicial system, jury mission must consistent through on case of ruling, or the jury mission on must dissolved, again elected new of jury mission on the case again for ruling, So this left of 11 a jurors must follow that a jurors statement reason and tried to persuaded he, and not because accounted for absolute advantage will can put he easily slightly had, actually this Department movie from a began on insinuating to told has we a views: in a democratic of social in, each a a individual, each a voice are worth respect, all of people are is equal of, and not two Yuan business of, shouldn't has dictatorship authoritarian, also shouldn't has tribalism.

With the films plot slowly forward, doubts slowly surfaced. First of all, he is an important witness as the old man hobbled, even ears are not very sharp, and how could he when when the crime was committed in the case with the roar of trains passing through the Windows listen upstairs to the quarrel between father and son? And a faltering old man really walked more than 50 feet in a 15-second time distance? Jurors one by one, as the eighth powerful questions, so that the original determination of the guilt of the accused of the other jurors slowly open waver and change his view, first came out in support of eighth juror is the Nineth jurors, he endorses such a case need more discussion is problematic.

With first a people station out support eighth, jurors of views Hou, fifth,, and sixth, jurors also change has himself original of views, moment seems to all of brain are started up has, increasingly more of doubts was jurors are mining out, like as important exhibits of spring knife, dang eighth, jurors took out a put and crime weapon exactly of knife Shi, all are shocked has, then is edge of location, small boy than himself of father short seven inch, according to this height to speculated that, Little boy is hard to insert the flick first down father's chest, while the knife method is brought to question, a grew up in the slums of the jurors said that the bandits are the usual idiomatic way of the sword. Next is that live in incident room on street of ladies of confession, also by has everyone of questioned, court Shang a small details – – nasal between of pressure marks told everyone, she is long wearing glasses of, but incident at she are intends to sleep, traveled difficult sleep Shi see to window, see opposite occurred of murder, this when she should no wearing glasses, so she can real to see crime occurred did? As questions continue to be raised one after another, are considered irrefutable proofs of evidence before a little bit in the collapse, and one by one the 11 jurors were persuaded, they get rid of their professional and life experiences and prejudices arising from the growing environment, and so on, choose to trust and justice. As the eighth juror said in the movie: "we would come here, not to fight. We shoulder a heavy responsibility. I have always felt that this is the advantage of a democratic society. We received the letter, and been told to come here, decide on one end there is no crime with people we have never met, whatever the decision made, we were not able to take advantage, there is no loss, and that is the reason why our country so strong, we believe in fair and impartial. ”

51due留学教育原创版权郑重声明：原创留学生作业代写范文源自编辑创作，未经官方许可，网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为，未经同意的情况下，51Due有权追究法律责任。

51due为留学生提供最好的论文代写服务，亲们可以进入主页了解和获取essay代写的相关资讯，提供美国作业代写服务，详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ：800020041。