成功的企业领导发展趋势--Essay代写范文

Essay代写范文:“成功的企业领导发展趋势”，这篇论文主要描述的是在一个企业的管理当中领导所起到的作用是非常重要的，领导也是一个企业的核心，随着社会的发展，领导被划分为了正式领导和非正式领导，这也是一种趋势和潮流，领导者需要做出有责任心的决策，让团队成员所尊敬和信服，这样有利于领导者组织企业活动的凝聚力和有效的处理企业内部的关系。

Successful leadership is a trend nowadays. Leader - is a person in a group (organization), which enjoys a large, recognized authority, having the effect, which manifests as control actions. Member of the group, whom he recognizes the right to make responsible decisions in important situations for him, which is the most respected personality, actually plays a central role in organizing joint activities and regulate the relationship within the group.

In psychology, have been adopted different classification leaders: on the content of (the leader, inspirer and leader of the Executive); the nature of (the universal leader and situational leader); by activity (emotional leader and business leader), etc. The leader can be both the official head of the group. Distinguish: formal leadership - the process of influencing people to positions of office; informal leadership - the process of influencing people with their abilities, skills or other resources. Distinguished leadership styles: Authoritarian - establishing a rigid discipline, a clear division of responsibilities, the leader does not enter into the discussion, not listening to the group, imposing their views; Democratic - the leader consults with colleagues, listening to their arguments, encourages their initiative, focused on the opinion of the group, some of the powers delegated to other team members; Anarchist - the leader makes no claims to the team, no matter what does not insist, takes all suggestions of members of the group, without a conflict. Groups that are hardly organized, divided, and functional responsibilities in the group are distributed randomly, as described in Developing leadership strengths.

In contrast to the head, which sometimes deliberately elects and appoints more and who, being responsible for the situation in his team, has the official right to promotion and punishment of participants in joint activities, the informal leader is put forward spontaneously. He does not have any recognized outside of authority and it is not charged with any official duties. If the leader of the group and its leader are not the same person, the relationship between them may contribute to effective collaboration and harmonization of the group's life or, alternatively, to acquire the character of conflict, which is ultimately determined by the level of group development. For example, in the pro-social and antisocial associations are usually functions of a leader and manager that have different group members. In this case, most often the leader in this community-level social and psychological development is a team member is responsible primarily for the preservation and maintenance of a positive emotional atmosphere in the group, while the head, being aimed primarily at improving the effectiveness of group activities, often does not account for how this will affect the socio-psychological climate community.

In corporate groups, as well as in high socio-psychological level of development, generally, functions of a leader and manager are assigned to the same person. At the same time, the foundation of leadership and governance in these two types of highly psychologically groups are fundamentally different. So, if corporate groupings match status positions of a leader and the head, there is a real priority for government relations at the expense of the emotional terms of relationships, the pro-social group, high levels of development type group was emotional "feeding" power often acts as an essential foundation for the implementation of formal authority, as described in Building effective leaderships skills.

Leadership is the process of conducting a group of people, making it a team that generates results. It is the ability to motivate and influence team members, in an ethical and positive to contribute voluntarily and enthusiastically to achieve the objectives of the team and organization. So the leader differs from the boss, who is the person responsible for a task or activity of an organization and, to this end, leads a group of people, having authority to command and demand obedience. For managers, today are required not only the skills of the chief, but especially the leaderships skills.

The nature and exercise of leadership has been studied in humans throughout their history. Bernard Bass (2007) argues that “since his childhood, the study of history has been the study of leaders - what and why they did what they did.” The search of the ideal leader is also present in the philosophy. Plato, for example, argued in The Republic that the conductor had to be educated in the right, describing his ideal “philosopher king”. Other examples of philosophers who addressed the issue are Confucius and his “wise king”, as well as Tao and his “servant leader”.

Scholars argue that the leadership issue as scientific research has emerged only after the 1930s outside the field of philosophy and history. Over time, research and literature on leadership has evolved from theories that describe personal characteristics and traits of effective leaders, through a functional approach outlining the basic that effective leaders should do, and coming to a contingency or situational approach, which proposes are more flexible, adaptive for effective leadership.

In recent years, most of these studies and works have been criticized for being too narrow in scope, more concerned with explaining the behavior of leaders face to face with their employees, rather than examine the leaders in the larger context of their organizations, providing little attention to the role of organizational leadership in terms of treatment of environmental change. The process of utmost importance to the emphasis must be done, as stated in Leadership development methods and tips.

Chiavenato, according to the Theory of Human Relations, found leadership influence on people's behavior. There are three main theories about leadership: Personality traits- according to this theory the leader has striking personality characteristics that qualify it to function. Leadership styles - this theory identifies three leadership styles: autocratic, democratic and liberal. Leadership situations (Contingency theory:)-  in this theory the leader can take on different patterns of leadership in accordance with the situation and to each member of the team. For Lacombe, leaders influence people through its power, which can be the legitimate power derived from the exercise of an office, referent power, depending on the qualities and the charisma of the leader of knowledge and power, exercised through the knowledge that the leader holds.

Thus, one can define leadership as the process of directing and influencing the activities relating to the duties of members of a group. However, there are three important implications of this definition. First, leadership involves other people, which will help in defining the status of the leader. Second, leadership involves an unequal distribution of power between leaders and other members of the group. And third, the leadership is the ability to use different forms of power to influence followers in various ways.

In fact, leaders influence followers. For this reason, many believe that leaders have a duty to consider the ethics of their decisions. While leadership is important for management and closely related to it, leadership and management are not the same concepts. Planning, budgeting, monitoring, and maintaining order, developing strategies and other activities are part of management. Management is what we do. Leadership is about us.

A person can be an effective manager, a good planner and manager, a fair and organized, and yet not to have the motivational skills of a leader. Or just the opposite occurs. A person can be an ineffective manager, but in contrast, have the skills necessary for a good leader, as described in Developing leadership strengths. Among the challenges posed by the changing environment, organizations are increasingly valuing managers who have leadership skills. Anyone who aspires to be an effective manager must also be aware of practice and develop their leadership skills.

Leadership Styles. Autocratic leadership: leadership of the autocratic leader is focused only on the tasks. This type of leadership is also called the authoritarian leadership or policy. The leader takes individual decisions, disregarding the views of subordinates. The leader determines the steps and techniques for performing the tasks, unpredictably to the group. Besides the task that each must perform, the leader also determines what your fellow worker does. The leader is dominating personal in his praise and, as well, criticism in the work of each member. Democratic Leadership: Called also participative leadership or advisory, this type of leadership is related to people and no participation of the followers in decision making. Here guidelines are discussed and decided by the group, encouraged and assisted by the leader. The group itself outlines the steps to achieve the target requesting technical advice to the leader when necessary, from this to suggest two or more alternatives for the group chooses. Tasks gain new perspectives to the debate. The division of labor at the discretion of itself and each member can choose their own colleagues. The leader seeks to be a regular member of the group. His objective is limited to the facts in the criticism and praise. In this kind of leadership the people have more freedom in implementing their projects, possibly indicating a mature team, self directed and who does not need constant supervision. On the other hand, the liberal leadership can also be a sign of weak leadership and neglect, where the leader misses flaws and mistakes without correcting them.

Paternalistic leadership: Paternalism is an atrophy of leadership where the leader and his team have interpersonal relationships similar to those of father and son. The paternalistic leadership can be comfortable and led to avoid conflicts, but is not the appropriate model in a professional relationship as a parental relationship, the more important for the parent is the child unconditionally. Already in a professional relationship, the balance must prevail and the results to be achieved by the team are more important than an individual. Although the leadership styles have been previously identified and described with these or other names, there are other leadership styles associated with the causal relationship between each style and the effects on work climate and performance: style visionary- it directs people to shared visions and dreams. It has a very positive effect on the workplace climate. It is suitable for situations where changes occur that require a new vision. Style Counsel: A list of people’s wants with the organization's goals. Help an employee to be more efficient, improving their long-term capabilities. Relational Style: Creates harmony by improving relations between people. Ideal to resolve conflicts and heal in a group, giving motivation in difficult times, improve relationships between people. Style Pressed: Reaches difficult and challenging goals. Has a negative effect at times on the working environment because it is often poorly executed. Driving style: Soothes fears by giving clear instructions in emergency situations. It is appropriate in crisis situations; to spark a turnaround in the situation, with difficult subordinates. Leadership style, has always been complex, because it is directly conditioned on the reactions of human behavior, but it has to be situational, flexible and adapted to the results they want, as stated in Developing leadership strengths. The main intended goal should count the steps of autocratic, democratic and liberal considering the receiver with the actions of self-esteem and affectivity (respect to the leader). The style should be situational due to the continuous improvement of the entire situation.

Management differs from leadership in that, and here may also be the execution of tasks without proper management. Leadership without the conscious consent of the leading is manipulation. Leadership is a responsible task. Errors can lead the company and the employees affected by damage. The proof of misconduct is to be provided, however difficult it is, especially if they withdraw the leader of a failed analysis, as described in Building effective leaderships skills.

General tour is always in the context of the given conditions of the environment, what can be described as a management situation. Organizational Leadership takes place in the context of organizational, business administration, business education and organizational psychology. Leadership is the intention and goal-oriented manipulation of the behavior of employees to achieve the objectives of a company. Leadership is methodologically thoughtful, planned and controlled influence on others and their future design skills, while simultaneously legitimizing the senior interests. This leadership and management are distinguished. Management has a locomotion function to achieve the objectives (solution-oriented), cohesion function in the group to group maintenance and group size. Line, however, has a weaker coordinating role for the causal, final and temporal linkage of the review work of individuals, organization to function causal, final and temporal order of the potential contribution of individuals. Leadership can be based on the task of the guided person, or a mixture of both. There are different leadership styles and management models.

Particularly in the case of leadership in organizations there is more accurate understanding of the leadership of central importance. Leadership differs from a management position. The supervisor (or manager) has rights and duties only through his position as opposed to a leader. This requires recognition and acceptance by the followers. Guide is available only if the influence attempt is undertaken and accepted by the leader to influence of these and is reflected in their behavior. Leadership is not even attempt to influence, but must be as accepted influence attempt "to influence the conduct of the coming to expression.

The criterion of recognition and acceptance makes possible the distinction between a supervisor and a manager, as described in Leadership development methods and tips. Any person may formally be superior to another person, must be accepted but not necessarily as a leader. The acceptance may result from a similar charisma or created through performance.

After interviewing the colleagues and family members, the situation considering my leadership approach has become clearer to me. I have interviewed five people, among them were my colleagues, my sister and my friends. The interviews were held in person and we talked a lot. The questions touched the leadership skills, my competency, integrity of a leader, my core strengths and what has to be developed in the future. I received different answers as the people were from family, from work and also friends. They have seen my abilities from the different angles and have described my opportunities differently. Friends told me that I had to develop leadership skills more seriously and to read more literature considering this, my sister told me that I have enough competency and integrity, and that I have to set the goals to explore different areas that I am interested in, as soon as possible, as the competition is high. And my colleagues said that I have core strengths and enough knowledge to be a leader, that I also have a certain charisma and faith in the bright future for the firm and for the career, and that I have perspectives and the appropriate character to achieve what I really want.

PART II

Thinking about myself in 5 years into the future, I can possibly imagine and create a vision of what I will be like as a leader. Although it is rather difficult to predict what I will be doing in five years, I think that some of my principles and goals will still remain with me, as they are fundamental and the most important. I think that my leadership will be surrounded by colleagues and smart people, who, together, will guarantee a success.

As a leader, I will create a small business and I will have a team of people who will be devoted to their work. I will contribute to the friendly atmosphere inside the company, to the development of new ideas, approaches and new creative ways of going forward. Corporative culture along with the trainings, conferences and seminars will be a part of the success and positive results for the company.

I will be best known for being competent, having management and leadership skills, multicultural awareness and problems solving creativity. Strengths I will be known for will include quality approach, individual capability, spirit of innovation, speed and effective solution and execution. People will seek out my specific leadership because I will be a responsible person with certain potential, with the knowledge of different foreign languages and with the desire to know more trendy issues, in the sphere I am interested. People will be looking for a professional and a person to trust, and I think that I will correspond to these requirements.

There will be a big difference in the strengths, approaches and behaviors that people see in me today, as when a person is young, people do not see a professional in his with an experience, even if he has it. And when a person is much older, then people around start to see his experience, his background and his capabilities. I think that getting older can help me discover my potential, to understand the main spheres in work and finally realize what I would like to do. Leadership as a quality will be extremely useful, as sometimes people value more the intentions and efforts than the knowledge.

It is always difficult to predict something or to understand, as people always need time. I will need time to think as well, as only with experience and circumstances it can become clearer what for I will need the leadership skills, in what sphere, with which people and how soon. Today, the 5 years seem to be too far, but I think that in five years I will be another person, more mature, more confident, determined what to do, with clearer goals and understanding.

Leadership is an important issue for managers due to the critical role that leaders represent the effectiveness of group and organization. Leaders are responsible for success or failure of organization. Being a successful leader is not a simple task. On the contrary, leadership requires patience, discipline, humility, respect and commitment, because the organization is a living being, endowed with employees of many different types. Leading in a clear way can be understood as the effective and efficient management of a team of people so that they meet the objectives proposed by the organization. The leadership is taking place against the backdrop of various social contexts such as family, school, college, politics, economy, military and sports inside or outside an institution or organization.  In modern industrial society, in particular the principle of management of an organization is paramount. It represents the person of the leader as one (ahead of) knowledge, (initial) order and (time) to a group member's motivation mediating with defined decision making, as stated in Leadership development methods and tips.

 There are many definitions of being a leader, and this word carries many skills and opportunities for a person. Clearly understanding who the leader is will help to achieve the desired goals. Some people do not want to be leaders and they do not need to. They have another type of a job and they are completely satisfied. But other people are aimed to become leaders, to succeed, to prove to themselves and to others that they can be successful and they will be successful. But the most important thing is to be able to understand what for the leadership is. Is it really necessary? Or is it just a modern trend? Can a person live without being a leader or without being considered a leader? Is it possible to achieve success without being a leader? Answering these questions individually will help people determine what they really want, to see the situation more clearly and to help them realize the most important points in their lives. As well, it should be understood, that the leadership skills do not guarantee success, happiness or respect from others. Leadership can rise chances to get a job or to get a promotion or to succeed in life, but it does not guarantee the improvement of knowledge, as it should be done separately. Reading leadership literature will help to determine the key points that have to be read and taken into consideration, as anyway, they will be useful in life.

In the world history, there are other views on the legitimacy of leadership. Leadership has become one of the main trends in the world, as for many people it guarantees definite success. The anthropological reasoning test claims that people need to be performed and that people want to be out, as stated in Building effective leaderships skills. This first justification excludes people who do not wish to lead and speak that way. It is overlooked that individual self-determination by no means implies, tends towards a declared objective third party higher-quality or even strives to have. The second reason attempt is to explain the emergence of the leadership phenomenon of functional art is accepted, first, that many solutions require a common action, as described in Building effective leaderships skills. As part of such an interaction, however, there is a need for coordination, as it increases with the number of people in the joint resolution. Leadership has become an indispensable component of success, which determines person’s reputation, character, goals and behavior.

Nowadays, there are many opportunities for any person to become a leader, as people consider this skill as one of the most important and the most needed. In the modern society those who consider themselves the most modern, clever and “leaders”, they strive to got the best job offers, showing the possible future employers the skills and strength they have, their vision of the activities in the company, their optimistic way of thinking, creative offers and new ideas. I think that each person has to have his personal goals along with the career goals, which will help define the key aims and approaches. Correct positive thinking, clear goals and certain charisma determine the leader as a successful person with the bright future.

51due留学教育原创版权郑重声明：原创留学生作业代写范文源自编辑创作，未经官方许可，网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为，未经同意的情况下，51Due有权追究法律责任。

51due为留学生提供最好的服务，亲们可以进入主页了解和获取essay代写的相关资讯 提供美国作业代写以及加拿大math辅导服务，详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ:800020041哟。-xz