服务承诺
资金托管
原创保证
实力保障
24小时客服
使命必达
51Due提供Essay，Paper，Report，Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导，同时涵盖Personal Statement，转学申请等留学文书代写。
51Due将让你达成学业目标51Due将让你达成学业目标51Due将让你达成学业目标51Due将让你达成学业目标私人订制你的未来职场 世界名企，高端行业岗位等 在新的起点上实现更高水平的发展
积累工作经验
多元化文化交流
专业实操技能
建立人际资源圈What impact does foreign direct investment have on economic growth---Essay代写范文精选
2016-07-08 来源: 51Due教员组 类别: Essay范文
51Due论文代写平台Essay代写范文：What impact does foreign direct investment have on economic growth这篇论文主要讲述了对外直接投资对经济增长有何影响，对外投资能够直接促进国内经济的增长，带动国内经济的发展。给出了方案，需要政府改变对外投资政策，刺激外国公司投资。
What impact does foreign direct investment have on economic growth
In this essay we review the causality between Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) and economic development in emerging and developed countries, in both directions according to recent studies of a few researchers. From this preliminary research we have seen that there is no clear tendency to the direction of this causal interaction. But according to most researchers the Foreign Direct Investment have a positive correlation with the GDP growth, an increase in FDI factor would cause economic development and so GDP increase under certain economic conditions.
1.0 Introduction
Foreign direct investments or FDI define as investments involving a long term affiliation of an overseas company in an enterprise based in a country other than the investor’s country (Kamath, 2008). FDI can be done by incorporating an entirely owned company, through a merger or an acquisition of a not related company or by participating in an equity joint venture with another investor or company in the host country. FDI does not include investments through purchase of shares. Most of the empirical studies support the argument that FDI play an important role as an engine of economic growth for both developed and emerging countries. Until 1980 most emerging economies viewed FDI with skepticism because they believed that it was an economic form of colonialism and raised trade barriers (Shu-Chen, 2010). During the last 30 years this thesis change dramatically and they relax regulations, reform their investment policies and offer incentives to multinationals to invest. This change happened because developing countries understand the benefits of FDI for their domestic economy and its growth through the FDI’s capital inflows which are more attractive than the bank loans (Battena, 2009). This change explains the tremendous increase of inward FDI funds to emerging economies from $54 billions in 1980 to $1.4 trillion in 2000.
2.0 Literature Review文献回顾
According to several theoretical models FDI promotes economic growth like the Solow neoclassical model suggests, but empirical tests have shown that this theory has its limitations. ? FDI can increase a country’s GDP significantly when FDI takes the form of a Greenfield-FDI compare to M&As FDI form, (Mergers and Acquisitions) which can lead to completely undesirable economic results(Nanda, 2009). Greenfield investment is when a multinational creates in a developing county a new business in a district where no previous facility exists. But the host country is not sure that will enjoy high growth rates even when there is Greenfield-FDI like in Mexico where the impact of this type of FDI concentrated in specific industries and it is difficult to be a spillover-effect in order to drive the economy upwards. In this case the domestic investments have a greater impact on GDP growth (Oladipo, 2007).
In most of Latin America’s countries the FDI increase the GDP significantly in the long term because it is a long term source of capital investment and the investors obtain earnings from productive activities in a long period and it is difficult to divest (Falla, 2009). Also FDI helps a country to overcome its capital shortages and also increase the domestic investments and consequently its GDP in short-term (Tang, 2008).
FDI could boost the GDP like in China and Ireland (Rios-Morales, 2007) because it increases the level of employment, introduce new technologies, through labor training transfer skills to employees help the host country to better use their resources, promote the competition with the existing local companies and in most of the cases increase their tendency to invest and thus increase also the domestic investment (Abor, 2008). Further more foreign subsidiaries learn to local companies how to export in foreign markets and so increase the host country’s trade balance surpluses (Hetes, 2009).
Most of the countries in order to maintain a sustainable level of GDP growth like China, Ireland, Ghana, Kenya and Angola need to attract FDI by encouraging and support foreign investors (Jacques, 2010). But there are some countries where there is a reverse causality between FDI and GDP, from GDP growth to FDI growth and not the opposite like in India, Malaysia and South Africa (Pradhan, 2008) because of the corruption (Brouthers, 2008), low infrastructure, insufficient capital and financial markets, high tariff barriers, no tax incentives, macroeconomic instability, high volatility of the home-country’s exchange rate (MacDermott, 2008), and lack of skilled labor (Busse, 2008). The importance of skilled human capital is evidence in most of the studies that boosts economic development because it can absorb new ideas and manufactured goods brought from foreign investors (Varamini, 2007). There is a strong positive correlation between lack of skilled human capital and its negative effect in economic growth. Countries with such tough regulated economies have a low stream of FDI and when there are capital inflows could not take advantage of them (Farshid, 2009).
There are also countries like Japan where there are no causal relationships between FDI and GDP growth in either direction especially in the manufacturing sector which is highly regulated (Asheghian, 2009). In Japan for instance the increase in GDP is an outcome of a raise in productivity and in domestic investment.
FDI according to empirical results for the Central and Eastern European countries, contribute in a different way in the host country’s economic development during their life cycle (Hetes, 2009). At the initial stage of the investments the effects for the economy are negative and the economic growth comes at the maturity stage when investments become less volatile and they add value to the economy.
An additional characteristic of FDI is, that there is a stronger positive correlation between an inward FDI and a host country’s GDP if this country is a developed one, compared to a developing country where the effects are (Ghosh, 2009). There are findings also that support the argument that for a developed country there is positive correlation between outward FDI and its GDP growth rate but for a developing one there is a negative correlation (Alhakimi, 2009).
3.0 Conclusion总结
From our literature review we extract the following results:
In most of the developing countries GDP growth has a strong positive correlation with the FDI because these host countries fully liberalize their economies.
There are also few developing countries where there is a negative correlation between FDI and GDP growth because those countries have not done the necessary transformations to their economy and there are adverse economic results like contraction of GDP.
In another category we find developing countries where there is reverse causal relationship, from increase in economic development to increase in FDI. This is happening because these countries have maintained high barriers to entry in certain sectors of their economies in order to protect the local businesses.
Developed countries like Japan where there is no causal relationship in either direction between FDI and GDP growth. Economic development based solely on domestic investments.
In the latter category involves developed countries like USA where there is very strong relationship between FDI and economic development, because these countries qualified to fully absorb the elements arising from the foreign direct investments.
51Due原创版权郑重声明：原创范文源自编辑创作，未经官方许可，网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为，未经同意的情况下，51Due有权追究法律责任。
51due为留学生提供最好的作业代写服务，想获取更多report代写范文，亲们可以进入主页 www.51due.com 为留学生提供report代写服务，了解详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ:800020041哟。-lc
What impact does foreign direct investment have on economic growth
In this essay we review the causality between Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) and economic development in emerging and developed countries, in both directions according to recent studies of a few researchers. From this preliminary research we have seen that there is no clear tendency to the direction of this causal interaction. But according to most researchers the Foreign Direct Investment have a positive correlation with the GDP growth, an increase in FDI factor would cause economic development and so GDP increase under certain economic conditions.
1.0 Introduction
Foreign direct investments or FDI define as investments involving a long term affiliation of an overseas company in an enterprise based in a country other than the investor’s country (Kamath, 2008). FDI can be done by incorporating an entirely owned company, through a merger or an acquisition of a not related company or by participating in an equity joint venture with another investor or company in the host country. FDI does not include investments through purchase of shares. Most of the empirical studies support the argument that FDI play an important role as an engine of economic growth for both developed and emerging countries. Until 1980 most emerging economies viewed FDI with skepticism because they believed that it was an economic form of colonialism and raised trade barriers (Shu-Chen, 2010). During the last 30 years this thesis change dramatically and they relax regulations, reform their investment policies and offer incentives to multinationals to invest. This change happened because developing countries understand the benefits of FDI for their domestic economy and its growth through the FDI’s capital inflows which are more attractive than the bank loans (Battena, 2009). This change explains the tremendous increase of inward FDI funds to emerging economies from $54 billions in 1980 to $1.4 trillion in 2000.
2.0 Literature Review文献回顾
According to several theoretical models FDI promotes economic growth like the Solow neoclassical model suggests, but empirical tests have shown that this theory has its limitations. ? FDI can increase a country’s GDP significantly when FDI takes the form of a Greenfield-FDI compare to M&As FDI form, (Mergers and Acquisitions) which can lead to completely undesirable economic results(Nanda, 2009). Greenfield investment is when a multinational creates in a developing county a new business in a district where no previous facility exists. But the host country is not sure that will enjoy high growth rates even when there is Greenfield-FDI like in Mexico where the impact of this type of FDI concentrated in specific industries and it is difficult to be a spillover-effect in order to drive the economy upwards. In this case the domestic investments have a greater impact on GDP growth (Oladipo, 2007).
In most of Latin America’s countries the FDI increase the GDP significantly in the long term because it is a long term source of capital investment and the investors obtain earnings from productive activities in a long period and it is difficult to divest (Falla, 2009). Also FDI helps a country to overcome its capital shortages and also increase the domestic investments and consequently its GDP in short-term (Tang, 2008).
FDI could boost the GDP like in China and Ireland (Rios-Morales, 2007) because it increases the level of employment, introduce new technologies, through labor training transfer skills to employees help the host country to better use their resources, promote the competition with the existing local companies and in most of the cases increase their tendency to invest and thus increase also the domestic investment (Abor, 2008). Further more foreign subsidiaries learn to local companies how to export in foreign markets and so increase the host country’s trade balance surpluses (Hetes, 2009).
Most of the countries in order to maintain a sustainable level of GDP growth like China, Ireland, Ghana, Kenya and Angola need to attract FDI by encouraging and support foreign investors (Jacques, 2010). But there are some countries where there is a reverse causality between FDI and GDP, from GDP growth to FDI growth and not the opposite like in India, Malaysia and South Africa (Pradhan, 2008) because of the corruption (Brouthers, 2008), low infrastructure, insufficient capital and financial markets, high tariff barriers, no tax incentives, macroeconomic instability, high volatility of the home-country’s exchange rate (MacDermott, 2008), and lack of skilled labor (Busse, 2008). The importance of skilled human capital is evidence in most of the studies that boosts economic development because it can absorb new ideas and manufactured goods brought from foreign investors (Varamini, 2007). There is a strong positive correlation between lack of skilled human capital and its negative effect in economic growth. Countries with such tough regulated economies have a low stream of FDI and when there are capital inflows could not take advantage of them (Farshid, 2009).
There are also countries like Japan where there are no causal relationships between FDI and GDP growth in either direction especially in the manufacturing sector which is highly regulated (Asheghian, 2009). In Japan for instance the increase in GDP is an outcome of a raise in productivity and in domestic investment.
FDI according to empirical results for the Central and Eastern European countries, contribute in a different way in the host country’s economic development during their life cycle (Hetes, 2009). At the initial stage of the investments the effects for the economy are negative and the economic growth comes at the maturity stage when investments become less volatile and they add value to the economy.
An additional characteristic of FDI is, that there is a stronger positive correlation between an inward FDI and a host country’s GDP if this country is a developed one, compared to a developing country where the effects are (Ghosh, 2009). There are findings also that support the argument that for a developed country there is positive correlation between outward FDI and its GDP growth rate but for a developing one there is a negative correlation (Alhakimi, 2009).
3.0 Conclusion总结
From our literature review we extract the following results:
In most of the developing countries GDP growth has a strong positive correlation with the FDI because these host countries fully liberalize their economies.
There are also few developing countries where there is a negative correlation between FDI and GDP growth because those countries have not done the necessary transformations to their economy and there are adverse economic results like contraction of GDP.
In another category we find developing countries where there is reverse causal relationship, from increase in economic development to increase in FDI. This is happening because these countries have maintained high barriers to entry in certain sectors of their economies in order to protect the local businesses.
Developed countries like Japan where there is no causal relationship in either direction between FDI and GDP growth. Economic development based solely on domestic investments.
In the latter category involves developed countries like USA where there is very strong relationship between FDI and economic development, because these countries qualified to fully absorb the elements arising from the foreign direct investments.
51Due原创版权郑重声明：原创范文源自编辑创作，未经官方许可，网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为，未经同意的情况下，51Due有权追究法律责任。
51due为留学生提供最好的作业代写服务，想获取更多report代写范文，亲们可以进入主页 www.51due.com 为留学生提供report代写服务，了解详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ:800020041哟。-lc
