Sensorimotor control--论文代写范文精选

反过来,这些动作行为必须适合手臂的移动。似乎有很多原因解释为什么新生儿不具备解决这些原因。适当的头部和躯干扶正反应开始出现在出生后2 - 3月。下面的essay代写范文进行详述。

Abstract 
What is the relationship between development of the nervous system and the emergence of voluntary motor behavior? This is the central question of the naturenurture discussion that has intrigued child psychologists and pediatric neurologists for decades. This paper attempts to revisit this issue. Recent empirical evidence on how infants acquire multi-joint coordination and how children learn to adapt to novel force environments will be discussed with reference to the underlying development of the nervous system. The claim will be made that the developing human nervous system by no means constitutes an ideal controller. However, its redundancy, its ability to integrate multi-modal sensory information and motor commands and its facility of time-critical neural plasticity are features that may prove to be useful for the design of adaptive robots.

Development of coordination 
At birth, a human infant can neither reach or grasp. From a control point of view, the completion of two processes are required to perform successful reaching. First, any neural controller must be capable to interact with its “plant” (i.e., the arm in this example) in such a way that centrally planned, complex actions can be executed. Second, visually specified goals must be linked to appropriate motor acts. These motor acts, in turn, must be suitable to move the arm to the desired goal. There are a number of reasons that seem to explain why newborn infants are not equipped to solve these two tasks: & They have limited postural control of the trunk, head and arms. Appropriate head and trunk righting reactions begin to emerge 2-3 month after birth (Milani-Comparetti and Gidoni 1967). & They have limited knowledge about the physical makeup of their bodies (i.e. moments of inertia, viscosity, stiffness of their arm segments). & They have only a limited movement repertoire consisting of an array of infant reflexes (i.e., grasping, sucking), and basal intra- and interlimb synergies (coupled flexor, extensor activity, coactivation) (Bekoff et al. 1989; Hadders-Algra et al. 1992).

They have limited visual capabilities. During the 1st postnatal month, the visual system provides the infant with functionally useful, but unrefined vision at a level of approximate 5% of adult acuity level. The infant can likely differentiate facial features from a distance of about 50 cm. Objects beyond this distance are probably not seen clearly (Atkinson and Braddick 1981). & They have not established a finite neural control structure. Most cortico-spinal projections are not differentiated. In a first stage, cortical neurons from all areas of the neocortex send collaterals to subcortical structures - a process termed arborization. In a second stage, these collaterals are pruned according to their later function (e.g., a visual projection, or motor projection - for a review: O'Leary 1992).

Neural development and behavior 
It is widely established that the emergence of voluntary motor behavior does not simply constitute the unfolding of a neural plan, but that orderly neural development is also dependent on the organism’s interaction with the environment. The dependency of sensory inputs for the establishment of a functional neuronal circuitry varies between species. Lower organisms and animals with a simple motor repertoire (e.g., gait of horses) often reveal adult-like motor patterns soon after birth. In contrast, non-human primates and humans require sensory stimulation to trigger processes of neural development that will then affect the development of motor control. In addition, the plasticity of the nervous system as well as the development of efferent and afferent projections is timecritical. That is, the organism undergoes “critical” periods of development, where the nervous system expects certain sensory inputs. The deprivation of such stimuli prior to a critical period might have little or no detrimental effects on certain aspects of sensorimotor development, but the failure of such stimulation during such period will negatively affect later sensorimotor function. For example, rearing a monkey for its first three postnatal months under far red illumination to make color vision impossible does not result in long lasting deficits in color vision (Brenner et al. 1990). Or, Hopi Indian infants, whose mobility is restricted in the first few months through the use of cradle boards (Dennis & Dennis 1940) do not show a delayed onset of walking (Harriman & Lukosius 1982).

Summary 
I have briefly outlined three areas of research that address the issue of how a complex system like a human child acquires motor skills, how skill learning requires adaptive force control and how neural development driven by endogenous and exogenous factors facilitates the emergence of voluntary motor control. Although the notion of brain plasticity is likely not easily implemented in an artificial system, an understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying adaptive learning and control in human infants may provide fruitful ideas for the design of adaptive robots.（essay代写)

51Due网站原创范文除特殊说明外一切图文著作权归51Due所有；未经51Due官方授权谢绝任何用途转载或刊发于媒体。如发生侵犯著作权现象，51Due保留一切法律追诉权。（essay代写)
更多essay代写范文欢迎访问我们主页 www.51due.com 当然有essay代写需求可以和我们24小时在线客服 QQ:800020041 联系交流。-X（essay代写)